2015
DOI: 10.1002/polb.23743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical fluctuations and static inhomogeneities in polymer gel volume phase transitions

Abstract: Thermoresponsive polymer gels exhibit pronounced swelling and deswelling upon changes in temperature, accompanied by dynamic concentration fluctuations that have been interpreted as critical opalescence. These fluctuations span lengthscales similar to that of static structures in the gels, such as the gel polymer-network meshsize (1-10 nm) and static polymer-network crosslinking inhomogeneities (10-1000 nm). To systematically investigate this overlay, we use droplet-based microfluidics and fabricate submillime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(107 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a behavior might be explained, at least from a qualitative standpoint, by noting that K is the inverse of the isothermal compressibility χ T . Even though it is still not clear whether the VPT in microgels should be modeled as a proper phase transition or as a crossover, 92,93 χ T should always display a maximum at the transition (or crossover) temperature. Nevertheless, we do not observe any minimum in K. One possible reason for this behavior could be the small size of the investigated microgels, whereas another reason could be the fact that we use an implicit solvent.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a behavior might be explained, at least from a qualitative standpoint, by noting that K is the inverse of the isothermal compressibility χ T . Even though it is still not clear whether the VPT in microgels should be modeled as a proper phase transition or as a crossover, 92,93 χ T should always display a maximum at the transition (or crossover) temperature. Nevertheless, we do not observe any minimum in K. One possible reason for this behavior could be the small size of the investigated microgels, whereas another reason could be the fact that we use an implicit solvent.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained values correspond to the microgel mesh sizes reported in the literature. 11,38,60 Thus, the polymers in the network of f-MG x are distributed more uniformly and behave like Gaussian chains in solution (exponents of the fractal Porod law of 1.5-2.5). The crosslinker in b-MG x is mostly localized in the core part of the particle.…”
Section: Structural Inhomogeneities Below the Vpttmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, they can be compressed to packing density in excess of random close packing and their increase in viscosity as they approach the liquid-solid boundary shows significant deviations from the behaviour of hard spheres 6 , 7 . Moreover, microgels exhibit a rich phase behaviour 8 10 , which can be tailored by their degree of crosslinking 11 , the presence of charges 12 or inherent network inhomogeneities 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%