1997
DOI: 10.1080/15428119791012810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Features of an Auditable Management System for an ISO 9000-Compatible Occupational Health and Safety Standard

Abstract: An International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001: 1994-harmonized occupational health and safety (OHS) management system has been written at the University of Michigan, and reviewed, revised, and accepted under the direction of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (OHSMS) Task Force and the Board of Directors. This system is easily adaptable to the ISO 14001 format and to both OHS and environmental management system applications. As wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…OSH program guidelines have been suggested by industry, OSH professionals, and voluntary standards bodies [OSHA, 1989;Meridian Research, 1994;Gardner and Winder, 1997;Levine and Dyjack, 1997;; OSHA and U.S. Department of Labor, 1998;Farabaugh, 2000;Podgorski, 2000;Redinger et al, 2002a,b], but few have been translated into assessment instruments and applied systematically in the field to yield normative data on the extent of implementation and characteristics of existing OSH programs. What literature is available is generally not peer-reviewed (e.g., government reports), and even the peer-reviewed literature tends to not fully report on assessment methods, ostensibly due to proprietary interests [Redinger et al, 2002a,b].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OSH program guidelines have been suggested by industry, OSH professionals, and voluntary standards bodies [OSHA, 1989;Meridian Research, 1994;Gardner and Winder, 1997;Levine and Dyjack, 1997;; OSHA and U.S. Department of Labor, 1998;Farabaugh, 2000;Podgorski, 2000;Redinger et al, 2002a,b], but few have been translated into assessment instruments and applied systematically in the field to yield normative data on the extent of implementation and characteristics of existing OSH programs. What literature is available is generally not peer-reviewed (e.g., government reports), and even the peer-reviewed literature tends to not fully report on assessment methods, ostensibly due to proprietary interests [Redinger et al, 2002a,b].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since their growth in the 1990s, they continue to gain importance in measuring performance and OSHH management success 2) . The three main components of an OHSMS common worldwide are establishing input parameters, risk assessment and control, and management and evaluation [2][3][4][5][6] . Taken together, they comprise an ORM basis for fundamental and comprehensive OSHH regulatory adherence.…”
Section: Building the Rlbms; Managing Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though in 1990s, the certification bodies were not promoting IMS, mainly due to business reason, yet, IMS does result in reduction of the auditing fee due to the commonalities of the requirement [21]. In addition to this, there are also discussions on ISO harmonized and ISO non-harmonized system, in which, methods of auditing and report writing were discussed [23].…”
Section: Aspects Of Ims Covered In the Literaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%