Critical Factors for Implementing Open Source Hardware in a Crisis: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

The rapid spread of COVID-19 has created an urgent demand for critical items including clinical care equipment and protective personal equipment. The failure of traditional industry to meet this demand has led to a huge response from the maker community, who are rapidly mobilising to produce Open Source Hardware (OSH) solutions. Community-driven, distributed manufacturing is enabling production on a global scale never seen before. In this paper, we focus on sensemaking as a process by which meaning is given to collective experiences. We identify six case studies of OSH projects responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, and report on their activities between March-June 2020. In doing so, we uncover several novel collaborations that are emerging between the informal maker community and other formal institutions, including research institutions, non-government organisations and incumbent manufacturers. By observing and reflecting upon these experiences, we identify potential critical factors for implementing OSH in a crisis. We highlight the importance of establishing legitimacy and community management, as well as the enabling conditions in the ecosystem that make OSH more favourable. These findings have implications for various actors beyond the Maker community. In conclusion, we suggest several promising areas for further research. In particular, we believe that this initial study of OSH during the COVID-19 provides a foundation for further longitudinal studies of OSH in a crisis.

Collaborative and Structured Network for Maintenance of Mechanical Ventilators during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic

“…It is important to emphasize that, in an unprecedented way, other initiatives were observed around the world, such as the development of new ventilators that were easy to manufacture [ 68 , 69 ]; the maintenance and production of medical hardware to help treat COVID-19 patients using 3-D printers [ 70 ] or even just building adapters to share ventilators and thus increase capacity [ 71 ].…”

Seven observations and research questions about Open Design and Open Source Hardware

“…There is no doubt that distributed design leads to viable product ideas, but relatively few products reach market readiness in Open Design settings. This is reflected in the recent attempts of the Open Source Hardware community to respond to the COVID-19 crisis (Chagas et al 2020;Corsini, Dammicco, & Moultrie 2020). Whereas lots of prototypes have been developed as an attempt to address medical supply shortages, few of these prototypes actually entered hospitals.…”

Maximizing design potential: investigating the effects of utilizing opportunistic and restrictive design for additive manufacturing in rapid response solutions

“…Similarly, Bezek et al (2021) compare the effectiveness of different materials used to additively manufacture respirators and provide recommendations for appropriately choosing materials to ensure safety. The emphasis on safety regulations is particularly underscored given the active role played by small-scale voluntary "makers" in facilitating the design and rapid manufacturing of AM solutions, as discussed in the series of studies by Corsini et al (2020aCorsini et al ( , 2020bCorsini et al ( , 2020c. In contrast to these suggestions to emphasize the safety of AM solutions, Salmi et al (2020) review various COVID-19-related AM solutions (e.g.…”