2000
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/33/46/303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical exponents of the KPZ equation via multi-surface coding numerical simulations

Abstract: We study the KPZ equation (in D = 2, 3 and 4 spatial dimensions) by using a RSOS discretization of the surface. We measure the critical exponents very precisely, and we show that the rational guess is not appropriate, and that 4D is not the upper critical dimension. We are also able to determine very precisely the exponent of the sub-leading scaling corrections, that turns out to be close to 1 in all cases. We introduce and use a multi-surface coding technique, that allow a gain of order 30 over usual numerica… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

55
176
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(46 reference statements)
55
176
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the above estimate also has an intersection with the best previous estimate of z for the KPZ class, in the range [1.605, 1.64] [32]. For the other values of F , the estimates of z also intercept this KPZ range.…”
Section: Numerical Study Of Roughness Scalingmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the above estimate also has an intersection with the best previous estimate of z for the KPZ class, in the range [1.605, 1.64] [32]. For the other values of F , the estimates of z also intercept this KPZ range.…”
Section: Numerical Study Of Roughness Scalingmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In order to test this scaling approach, we estimated the amplitudes A and B in the limit L → ∞ by extrapolating the ratios W sat (L)/L α and τ (L)/L z , respectively. The values α = 0.385 and z = 1.615 of the KPZ class [32] were used in the calculation of those quantities. Following the notation of Ref.…”
Section: Scaling Theory For the Crossover Of Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main results of our analysis indicates that the numerical solution obtained with a non-Galilean-invariant finite-difference scheme yields the same critical exponents as the well known ones obtained with the standard discretization scheme [Eq. (15)]. Moreover, even the discretization used in [?, ?…”
Section: It Is a Trivial Task To Verify That The Laplacian Is (∂mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementary experimental work was scant, but provocative-see early, comprehensive reviews [28,29,30]. This epoch closed with the beginnings of Finnish investigations [31] of kinetically-roughened KPZ firelines, key mathematical papers [32,33], as well as refreshing nonperturbative [34] and conformally invariant [35] perspectives, the former inspiring numerical rebuttals [36,37,38,39] of a stubborn, battered suggestion [40], revived nevertheless shortly thereafter [41], that 4+1 might be the upper critical dimension (UCD) of the KPZ problem. Recent numerics [42,43,44,45] appear to have buried this idea, but from the analytical side [46,47], there's lingering suspicion that something nontrivial is afoot near this particular dimension.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%