Discourse and Education 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02243-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Discourse Analysis in Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All in all, from a discourse analysis and semiotic perspective (see Fairclough, 2003;Rogers et al, 2005, Rogers, 2017, the surge and expansion of MOOC offerings is a sign of the times as well, for the better and for the worse. In this context, the monomedial text as the only (or hegemonic) parameter of 'authority' in teaching and learning is debilitating in favor of transmediality (Méchoulan & Carr, 2015;Nesselhauf & Schleich, 2015).…”
Section: The Discourse Analysis Approach and Moocsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All in all, from a discourse analysis and semiotic perspective (see Fairclough, 2003;Rogers et al, 2005, Rogers, 2017, the surge and expansion of MOOC offerings is a sign of the times as well, for the better and for the worse. In this context, the monomedial text as the only (or hegemonic) parameter of 'authority' in teaching and learning is debilitating in favor of transmediality (Méchoulan & Carr, 2015;Nesselhauf & Schleich, 2015).…”
Section: The Discourse Analysis Approach and Moocsmentioning
confidence: 99%