1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)64406-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Differences Between Species in the In Vivo and In Vitro Renal Responses to Antidiuretic Hormone Antagonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During chronic administration of these AVP analogues their an¬ tagonist actions on the antidiuretic effect of AVP are lost, revealing instead AVP agonistic effects (Hofbauer et al 1986, Brooks et al 1988, Mah & Hofbauer 1988, Albrightson-Winslow et al 1989). There are also species differences in the antagonistic effect of AVP analogues on the antidiuretic action of AVP (Stassen et al 1983). This is a serious problem, because the same AVP analogues cannot antagonize in both monkeys and man.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During chronic administration of these AVP analogues their an¬ tagonist actions on the antidiuretic effect of AVP are lost, revealing instead AVP agonistic effects (Hofbauer et al 1986, Brooks et al 1988, Mah & Hofbauer 1988, Albrightson-Winslow et al 1989). There are also species differences in the antagonistic effect of AVP analogues on the antidiuretic action of AVP (Stassen et al 1983). This is a serious problem, because the same AVP analogues cannot antagonize in both monkeys and man.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the a [d(CH2)5-D-Ile2,jle4]AVP for the Via receptors of rat and hunp liver probably reflect a genuine species difference. Such species differences have been noticed by others when studying vasopressin antagonists in the rat and dog (Liard et al, 1982;Stassen et al, 1983). The 10-fold lower affinity of[d(CH2)5-Tyr(Me)2]AVP for the human Vla receptor compared with the rat receptor would explain why [3H]AVP proved to be a better tracer ligand than [3H][d(CH2)5-Tyr(Me)2]AVP for human tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%