2023
DOI: 10.1155/2023/3136511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Device Reliability Assessment in Healthcare Services

Abstract: Medical device reliability is the ability of medical devices to endure functioning and is indispensable to ensure service delivery to patients. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) technique was employed in May 2021 to evaluate existing reporting guidelines on medical device reliability. The systematic searching is conducted in eight different databases, including Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, IEEE Explorer, Emerald, MEDLINE Complete, Dimensions, and Springer Lin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the primary goals of maintenance are dependability, maintainability, availability, and safety. Hence, medical equipment should not fail frequently and should be repaired as soon as a flaw is discovered ( Abd Rahman et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the primary goals of maintenance are dependability, maintainability, availability, and safety. Hence, medical equipment should not fail frequently and should be repaired as soon as a flaw is discovered ( Abd Rahman et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also established a quality index evaluation system for equipment downtime events, utilising the QCC. This system included nine quality control indicators and a weighted formula [ [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] ]. The quality control indicators included the following: 1) downtime, 2) spare parts cost, 3) failure recurrence, 4) operational errors, 5) uncontrollable factors, 6) weight allocation, 7) event frequency, 8) event risk weight, and 9) MTTR/MTBF ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%