1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.49.498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical currents and supercurrent oscillations in Josephson field-effect transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
63
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As was discovered in studies of Andreev reflection at Nb-InAs interfaces 40,44 , FWVM modifies the CPR of Superconductor/Semiconductor/Superconductor junctions. In the general case, where FWVM and barriers are included at the S-N interfaces, the bound state energies and the continuum current must be calculated from the transmission matrix formalism 46 , in which the transmission matrix includes a normal (specular) reflection coefficient as well as an Andreev (retro) reflection coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was discovered in studies of Andreev reflection at Nb-InAs interfaces 40,44 , FWVM modifies the CPR of Superconductor/Semiconductor/Superconductor junctions. In the general case, where FWVM and barriers are included at the S-N interfaces, the bound state energies and the continuum current must be calculated from the transmission matrix formalism 46 , in which the transmission matrix includes a normal (specular) reflection coefficient as well as an Andreev (retro) reflection coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the current-voltage characteristic ͑I-V͒ of the Wϭ4 m junction at 10 mK, which has a current density of almost 100 nA/m. For ballistic Nb-2DEG-Nb junctions of similar electron density, junction length, and effective mass, Chrestin et al 4 calculated a critical current density of approximately 20 times the experimental value. Even after taking into account the small differences between the experimental and theoretical device parameters, there still remains an order-of-magnitude difference between theory and experiment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1 We focus on transport properties of InAs-based superconductor two-dimensional electron gas superconductor junctions ͑S-2DEG-S͒, where the 2DEG is in the ballistic regime. Several theoretical [2][3][4] and experimental papers [5][6][7] describing these devices have been published. However, presently there is no agreement between the predicted and observed value of the critical current I c nor of its temperature dependence I c (T).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the large difference between ξ S and ξ 0 means that there is a substantial Fermi velocity mismatch (typically an order of magnitude 7,9 ), which must generate normal scattering at the SN interface in addition to Andreev reflection. This, together with other possible sources of scattering at the SN boundary, like imperfect interfaces 4,11,12 or charge accumulation layers 14 (typical of Nb/InAs contact), cannot be detected by only observing the independence of I c and R N on interelectrode separation (for intermediate 7 L). Nevertheless, this is frequently the criterion used in experiments 7 to ensure that the transport is ballistic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%