1997
DOI: 10.1109/77.620846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical current measurements at electric fields in the pV m/sup -1/ regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst an understanding of the V-I characteristics at high electric fields will add to an overall understanding of the behaviour of these joints (including quench characteristics), that V-I trends observed at high electric fields are not generally applicable at lower electric fields. The practical voltage measurement floor for the four-probe technique is typically ∼10 −9 V, and so it cannot generally be employed to directly measure the V-I characteristics of wires and joints under PM conditions [28,29]. An alternative technique, IRT, is instead employed to measure V-I characteristics at higher sensitivities.…”
Section: Four-probe V-i Measurements On Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whilst an understanding of the V-I characteristics at high electric fields will add to an overall understanding of the behaviour of these joints (including quench characteristics), that V-I trends observed at high electric fields are not generally applicable at lower electric fields. The practical voltage measurement floor for the four-probe technique is typically ∼10 −9 V, and so it cannot generally be employed to directly measure the V-I characteristics of wires and joints under PM conditions [28,29]. An alternative technique, IRT, is instead employed to measure V-I characteristics at higher sensitivities.…”
Section: Four-probe V-i Measurements On Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IRT method, otherwise known as the current or field decay method, measures V-I characteristics from the temporal-decay of currents flowing in inductive superconducting circuits. This technique has been used to analyse loss mechanisms in technological wires [28,29] and is the standard tool for characterising joints [24,[30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Irt Of Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also of interest is the critical current at a certain resistance criterion-I c (B,T). The measurement of persistent current resistances far exceeds the sensitivity limit of the four probe technique, for which voltage measurement sensitivity (∼1 nV) limits resistance sensitivity to ≳10 −12 Ω [6]. In light of this limitation, inductive resistance testing (IRT, otherwise known as the current decay method) has instead been widely used to characterise joints [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IRT technique measures the decaying magnetic field produced by a current flowing around a small superconducting sample coil (of self inductance L), closed by the joint of interest. In most cases, the resistance in the circuit (R) is dominated by losses in the joint, which typically has inferior superconducting properties to the parent wires [6]. The temporal decay of the field produced by the sample coil (or equally the coilʼs magnetic moment (μ) or current (I)) follows the standard form for L-R circuits…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ohmic resistance measurements on the boat joints were marginal with resistance ranging below 1 nΩ. To measure further smaller resistance, a current decay measurement would be necessary to estimate the resistance [30][31][32]. The voltage started to increase exponentially against current in high fields of over 1.0 T, which indicates that the Pb-Bi matrix started to change into the normal conducting state from the superconducting state.…”
Section: Resistance and Microstructure Of The Boat-type Jointmentioning
confidence: 99%