Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/29/7/075007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical current density and current distribution in field cooled superconducting disks

Abstract: Applications of bulk superconductors concern superconducting motors and generators, the levitation of vehicles, the generation of high magnetic fields with small size cryo-magnets, the shielding of magnetic fields and other applications. For all of them, it is essential to determine the critical current density, and to understand the effect of the shape and size of the bulks on the properties of interest. In this contribution, we show how the combination of levitation force and trapped field measurements allow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis is inconsistent with the suggestion that as the temperature decreases, the behavior of the superconductor tends toward the Meissner limit, a situation in which the current flows on the superconductor surface facing the permanent magnet only [34]. In contrast, calculations performed using the mean-field model result in decreasing values of t as the temperature decreases [25,33], i.e., coming nearer to the Meissner limit. Otherwise, applying the mean-field model requires only measuring or calculating the vertical component of the magnetic field along the magnet axis for determining the levitation forces and along the magnet radius at different Z for calculating the lateral ones (see Appendix I).…”
Section: Advantages and Limitations Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This hypothesis is inconsistent with the suggestion that as the temperature decreases, the behavior of the superconductor tends toward the Meissner limit, a situation in which the current flows on the superconductor surface facing the permanent magnet only [34]. In contrast, calculations performed using the mean-field model result in decreasing values of t as the temperature decreases [25,33], i.e., coming nearer to the Meissner limit. Otherwise, applying the mean-field model requires only measuring or calculating the vertical component of the magnetic field along the magnet axis for determining the levitation forces and along the magnet radius at different Z for calculating the lateral ones (see Appendix I).…”
Section: Advantages and Limitations Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…for this part of the cycle. Otherwise, the measurements and calculations reported in [25,33] result in 𝑡 ≀ ℎ 2 for all the investigated samples and we have no insights on the current distribution for 𝑡 > ℎ 2…”
Section: Calculation Of the Levitation Forcementioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean field model. The mean field model [109,136] is an analytical model based on the CSM developed for systems with the cylindrical symmetry of figure 8 and d pm d s . It is based on the following aspects of the physics of FC type II superconductors mentioned in section 2.3: (i) no shielding current but pinned vortices are induced during field cooling and (ii) the generation of shielding current aims at restoring the field that existed during field cooling.…”
Section: Models Based On the Minimization Of The Magnetic Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studies of modelling superconducting magnetic levitation, many different numerical and analytical approaches, such as the models of solving differential Maxwell equations combining different relations between the electric field and the current density in superconductor, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] the method based on the minimization of the magnetic energy [26,27] and the models based on the calculation of magnetic moments, [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] have been proposed. A very complete and comprehensive compilation for modelling magnetic levitation can be found in a recent review paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%