2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/educon.2017.7943078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical computational empowerment: Engaging youth as shapers of the digital future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the liquid workforce is agile and non-permanent in nature, and therefore, it poses a different set of engagement issues for these organizations (Accenture, 2016a(Accenture, , 2016b. Generally, youth have a desire for career and work flexibility (Tissenbaum et al, 2017;Wu, 2018), and the main objective of this study was to examine the mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between perceived career support and work performance and between career adaptability and work performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the liquid workforce is agile and non-permanent in nature, and therefore, it poses a different set of engagement issues for these organizations (Accenture, 2016a(Accenture, , 2016b. Generally, youth have a desire for career and work flexibility (Tissenbaum et al, 2017;Wu, 2018), and the main objective of this study was to examine the mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between perceived career support and work performance and between career adaptability and work performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such projects have taken advantage of the integrative nature of CT, leveraging computing as a means to engage in more familiar topics, such as music, dance, or storytelling, which may build students' attitudes and confidence toward computer science (e.g., Allen-Handy et al, 2020;Magerko et al, 2016;Pinkard et al, 2017;Weston & Biin, 2013). Other projects have utilized computing as a means for students to interrogate and counteract dominant cultural norms and inequality within society (e.g., Lee & Soep, 2016;Proctor & Blikstein, 2019;Tissenbaum et al, 2017;Vakil, 2014). Re-envisioning computer science pedagogy to be inclusive of student voices; relevant, and meaningful to students' interests and experiences; and connected to social issues within their communities is imperative to break the stereotype of who can and should participate in computer science (Ryoo, 2019).…”
Section: Broadening Access To Computing With Computational Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More traditional computing and programming activities also purposefully include and allow for cultural integration. The Scratch platform (Maloney et al, 2010;Resnick et al, 2009), EarSketch (Magerko et al, 2016), MIT App Inventor (Jimenez & Gardner-McCune, 2015;King et al, 2014;Tissenbaum et al, 2017;Vakil, 2014), and the Exploring Computer Science curriculum (Goode & Margolis, 2011;Ryoo et al, 2013) including adaptations to specific cities (Mejias et al, 2018;Washington et al, 2012;Washington & Burge, 2013) all teach computer science while also creating opportunities for youth to utilize and celebrate their various cultures.…”
Section: Resource Pedagogies and Culturally Relevant Curriculamentioning
confidence: 99%