1970
DOI: 10.1159/000264518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Comparison of Ophthalmodynamographic and Dynamometric Measurements

Abstract: A comparison of both methods (ODM and ODG) on 100 persons was undertaken. The ophthalmodynamometry was found to be superior. The ophthalmodynamography in its present form, is especially of advantage in cases of anophthalmos, opacity of refracting media, and extreme miosis where ODM can not be applied. In the rest of the cases it may be applied in addition to dynamometry, also in cases with side differences. In measuring thecerebral circulation and testing vasoactive substances dynamometry is superior.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

1972
1972
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The brachial blood pressure of normotensive persons remain in sitting and supine position unchanged. 3. In hypertension the systolic brachial blood pressure do not show significant difference by changing the position.…”
Section: Hypertensionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The brachial blood pressure of normotensive persons remain in sitting and supine position unchanged. 3. In hypertension the systolic brachial blood pressure do not show significant difference by changing the position.…”
Section: Hypertensionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[1968], dans une étude comparable, citent un coefficient de corrélation moins élevé (0.8865 et 0.6841, respectivement). Sayegh [1970] énonce des valeurs encore plus basses (0.71 et 0.68, respectivement).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…De récents travaux [Bettei.heim, 1965[Bettei.heim, , 1969Sayegh, 1970;R och, 1970] montrent, au contraire, que ces deux méthodes d'investigation se complètent.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Previous investigations have also shown that a high correlation (r = 0.9) exists between the brachial and the ophthalmic blood pressure [ Weigelin and Lobstein, 1963;Weigelin et al, 1964;Bedavanija, 1960;Sayegh, 1970], The standard deviation was found to be ±5.0 mm Hg. These findings were based on dynamometry measurements done in the sit ting position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%