1975
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/8/9/019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical behaviour of the continuous n-component Potts model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, exact two-dimensional results, numerical simulations and RG analysis suggest that for small n, the phase transition is of the second order [9,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, exact two-dimensional results, numerical simulations and RG analysis suggest that for small n, the phase transition is of the second order [9,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The corresponding RG equations can have several fixed points with different attractive properties [9,10,13,14,15,16,17,19]. This can lead to a very complicated pattern of the corresponding RG flows (solutions of the RG equations for the invariant charges) in the space of model parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…defines the simplex representation 16 that we will use to describe the observables measured in the simulations. In order to investigate the possible presence of ͑spurious͒ ferromagnetic effects we have carefully checked the value of the magnetization, looking for possible signs of spontaneous ferromagnetic ordering.…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…will start by rewriting the Hamiltonian (3) for the case of uniaxial symmetry, introducing in addition a single-particle anisotropy term: (6) where N is the total number of spins and z is the coordination number. lt can be seen that there is no information about the transverse coupling in this mean-field Hamiltonian, which for D =O would be exactly the same as in the symmetric case J 1 = J 2·…”
Section: Mean-field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%