2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1010-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical assessment of digital PCR for the detection and quantification of genetically modified organisms

Abstract: The number of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on the market is steadily increasing. Because of regulation of cultivation and trade of GMOs in several countries, there is pressure for their accurate detection and quantification. Today, DNA-based approaches are more popular for this purpose than protein-based methods, and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) is still the gold standard in GMO analytics. However, digital PCR (dPCR) offers several advantages over qPCR, making this new technique appealing also fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the increasing number and diversity of GMOs developed and the number of molecular biology technologies available in addition to PCR and qPCR, many different GMO detection methods have been developed (Broeders et al, 2012;Fraiture et al, 2015;Demeke and Dobnik, 2018) (for more information, see Supplementary Table 1 and references therein). Databases of GMO sequences and detection assays have also been compiled, facilitating the identification of an appropriate detection method or the development of a new technique for a given need (Dong et al, 2008;Petrillo et al, 2015;Wilkes et al, 2017).…”
Section: Gm Plant Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the increasing number and diversity of GMOs developed and the number of molecular biology technologies available in addition to PCR and qPCR, many different GMO detection methods have been developed (Broeders et al, 2012;Fraiture et al, 2015;Demeke and Dobnik, 2018) (for more information, see Supplementary Table 1 and references therein). Databases of GMO sequences and detection assays have also been compiled, facilitating the identification of an appropriate detection method or the development of a new technique for a given need (Dong et al, 2008;Petrillo et al, 2015;Wilkes et al, 2017).…”
Section: Gm Plant Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two main benefits of ddPCR are that precise quantification of DNA in samples is not based on a standard curve and that it is independent of amplification efficiency. In addition, the partitioning of a PCR into tens of thousands of individual reactions dilutes the effects of inhibitors on the reaction (Demeke & Dobnik, 2018). This method is particularly suitable for environmental detection of DNA due to the highly variable concentrations of inhibitors found in these samples.…”
Section: Diagnostic Methods For Zebrafishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of polydisperse droplets prepared using this same technique was previous demonstrated 13 and the stability of the reagents used in this work has been previously noted. 21,22…”
Section: Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%