1992
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/44.1-4.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Assessment of Calibration Techniques for Low Pressure Proportional Counters Used in Radiation Dosimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming a worst case scenario in which the A-150 plastic shrinks by a 1% ͑a possibility reported in the literature 29 ͒ during the use of the counters, a 3.4% uncertainty is estimated for the sensitive volume, and is conservatively assigned to the measurement of the absorbed dose. This value is the consistent with the 4% value used by Pihet et al 22 in their assessment of uncertainties is dose measurements using proportional counters.…”
Section: Estimation Of Uncertaintiessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Assuming a worst case scenario in which the A-150 plastic shrinks by a 1% ͑a possibility reported in the literature 29 ͒ during the use of the counters, a 3.4% uncertainty is estimated for the sensitive volume, and is conservatively assigned to the measurement of the absorbed dose. This value is the consistent with the 4% value used by Pihet et al 22 in their assessment of uncertainties is dose measurements using proportional counters.…”
Section: Estimation Of Uncertaintiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Pihet et al estimate an uncertainty of 2% associated with the estimation of the proton edge using the above procedure, which was adopted for all the measurements in this work. 22 The counters were filled and operated according to standard procedures. 23 The lineal energy spectrum of the absorbed dose in each counter was simultaneously measured over the range from ϳ0.6 keV/m to ϳ1400.0 keV/m in three parts using standard electronics and data acquisition system and stored in a file for further analysis.…”
Section: A Counters Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the resulting lineal energy calibrated by the a particles was multiplied by a factor of 0.964 in this study. 19 Finally an error (1 SD) of approximately 3.5% in the y D value was obtained by using the law of propagation of errors. Furthermore, the test pulses from a pulse generator (448, ORTEC) were sent to the preamplifier to confirm the linearity of the output from the electronics.…”
Section: Iia Electronics and Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 Kliauga has estimated an uncertainty of 2-3 % in the determination of the proton edge. 67 Thorough reviews of the calibration process and its associated uncertainties have been presented by Pihet 68 and Dietze. 69…”
Section: Counter Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%