2008
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials

Abstract: The Bayesian approach to finding the maximum-tolerated dose in phase I cancer trials is discussed. The suggested approach relies on a realistic dose-toxicity model, allows one to include prior information, and supports clinical decision making by presenting within-trial information in a transparent way. The modeling and decision-making components are flexible enough to be extendable to more complex settings. Critical aspects are emphasized and a comparison with the continual reassessment method (CRM) is perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
323
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(328 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
323
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dose escalation was guided by an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression model using the Escalation With Overdose Control principle (21). The dose-determining set, which included all patients from the safety set who met the minimum exposure criterion (!16 of the 21 planned daily doses during the first cycle) and had scheduled safety evaluations or experienced a DLT, was used for DLT/MTD determination.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dose escalation was guided by an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression model using the Escalation With Overdose Control principle (21). The dose-determining set, which included all patients from the safety set who met the minimum exposure criterion (!16 of the 21 planned daily doses during the first cycle) and had scheduled safety evaluations or experienced a DLT, was used for DLT/MTD determination.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NCT02043288). The Bayesian CRM model originated from Neuenschwander and was simulated, designed, and implemented using Fixed and Adaptive Clinical Trial Simulator (FACTS) software version 5.6 (22). The goals of the phase Ib portion of the trial were to determine the MTD and RP2D of NC-6004 in combination with gemcitabine and evaluate the initial activity and tolerability profile of the combination.…”
Section: Translational Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data support ongoing clinical investigations of sonidegib as a single agent in BCC and hedgehog pathway-activated medulloblastoma, and as a combination partner with other agents in other malignant disease settings. escalation decisions (15,16). A DLT was defined as a significant adverse event or abnormal laboratory parameter adjudged to be Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 3.0) grade !3 in severity and considered unrelated to disease progression, intercurrent illness, or concomitant medications.…”
Section: Translational Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%