2022
DOI: 10.23736/s0392-9590.21.04791-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical appraisal of evidence on bypass surgery versus endovascular treatment for intermittent claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Lower limb revascularization has been increasing in popularity for endovascular intervention owing to less invasiveness than bypass surgery, which was also corroborated by our result. However, bypass surgery is superior to endovascular intervention for long-term primary patency 26 ; further, Hsu et al have found that there was no significant difference in flap failure or limb salvage rate regarding the difference in revascularization between free flap reconstruction. 9 Our meta-analysis indicated a 5-year patient survival rate of 75% (95% CI, 50–88%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Lower limb revascularization has been increasing in popularity for endovascular intervention owing to less invasiveness than bypass surgery, which was also corroborated by our result. However, bypass surgery is superior to endovascular intervention for long-term primary patency 26 ; further, Hsu et al have found that there was no significant difference in flap failure or limb salvage rate regarding the difference in revascularization between free flap reconstruction. 9 Our meta-analysis indicated a 5-year patient survival rate of 75% (95% CI, 50–88%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%