2019
DOI: 10.1108/cpoib-02-2019-0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical and mainstream international business research

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to address the relationship between critical and mainstream international business (IB) research and discuss the ways forward for the former. Design/methodology/approach The paper empirically maps critical IB scholarship by analysing more than 250 academic articles published in critical perspectives on international business (cpoib) from 2005 to 2017. The paper also includes a citation analysis that uncovers how critical IB research is recognized and discussed in mainstream IB studies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a critical IB perspective, the focus of our research holds relevance for at least three reasons. First, heterogeneity between subnational institutions in the home market (our independent variable) is consistent with Yamin and Sinkovics’ (2015, p. 211) observation that emerging markets are “invariably large and somewhat differentiated territories in terms of social and economic development.” Their observation resonates with the importance paid by critical IB scholars to within-country inequalities, such as “uneven economic development” (Dörrenbächer and Gammelgaard, 2019, p. 240) and MNE activities (Rygh, 2019; Ackroyd and Murphy, 2013; Lee and Gereffi, 2015; Roberts and Dörrenbächer, 2016; Roberts, 2019). Second, in a similar vein, the phenomenon of EMNEs internationalizing into AEs rather than EEs (taken as a dependent variable) potentially relates to exacerbating the “global inequality” (Dörrenbächer and Michailova, 2019, p. 113) between these sets of countries, as AEs attract a relatively larger share of OFDI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…From a critical IB perspective, the focus of our research holds relevance for at least three reasons. First, heterogeneity between subnational institutions in the home market (our independent variable) is consistent with Yamin and Sinkovics’ (2015, p. 211) observation that emerging markets are “invariably large and somewhat differentiated territories in terms of social and economic development.” Their observation resonates with the importance paid by critical IB scholars to within-country inequalities, such as “uneven economic development” (Dörrenbächer and Gammelgaard, 2019, p. 240) and MNE activities (Rygh, 2019; Ackroyd and Murphy, 2013; Lee and Gereffi, 2015; Roberts and Dörrenbächer, 2016; Roberts, 2019). Second, in a similar vein, the phenomenon of EMNEs internationalizing into AEs rather than EEs (taken as a dependent variable) potentially relates to exacerbating the “global inequality” (Dörrenbächer and Michailova, 2019, p. 113) between these sets of countries, as AEs attract a relatively larger share of OFDI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The critical interpretations here certainly paint a gloomy picture but are presented to contrast with and to potentially influence mainstream views on the topic (Dörrenbächer and Gammelgaard, 2019). While this article focused on questioning and problematizing, there are likely many among both elite and non-elite positions who may be on the side of change efforts and engaged in addressing societal challenges during and beyond the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While different viewpoints to the contexts, needs and benefits need to be incorporated in IB studies, there is a threat that the conflicts and tensions among market actors remain understudied. By incorporating the dark sides (Burmester et al, 2019;Dörrenbächer and Gammelgaard, 2019;Enderwick, 2019), the research community could provide a more holistic and balanced view of renewable energy in IB.…”
Section: Global Production and Adoption Of Renewable Energymentioning
confidence: 99%