2003
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical analysis of the luminosity functions per galaxy type measured from redshift surveys

Abstract: Abstract. I perform a quantitative comparison of the shape of the optical luminosity functions as a function of galaxy class and filter, which have been obtained from redshift surveys with an effective depth ranging from z 0.01 to z 0.6. This analysis is based on the M * and α Schechter parameters which are systematically measured for all galaxy redshift surveys. I provide complete tables of all the existing measurements, which I have converted into the UBVR c I c Johnson-Cousins system wherever necessary.By u… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(418 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LF parameters are extracted from Table 6 of de for the shape parameters (using 2 for ellipticals and Centaurus parameters for dE+dS0 and Im+BCD galaxies) and from Table 1 of de Lapparent (2003) for the amplitudes φ * . The mapping made between the LF morphological types and the EFIGI types is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Morphological Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LF parameters are extracted from Table 6 of de for the shape parameters (using 2 for ellipticals and Centaurus parameters for dE+dS0 and Im+BCD galaxies) and from Table 1 of de Lapparent (2003) for the amplitudes φ * . The mapping made between the LF morphological types and the EFIGI types is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Morphological Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LF is well reproduced by the Schechter (1976) function where φ* is the number of galaxies per unit volume, L * is the characteristic luminosity which separates bright sources from faint sources and α is the slope of the LF. Different determinations of the local LF exist (see de Lapparent 2003 for a review) and they show several differences, in the sense that the parameters of the Schechter function are not fully constrained by observations. The LF can be measured in several bands, obviously depending on the redshift regime under investigation.…”
Section: Chemical and Photometric Evolution Of Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can understand this luminosity dependence for the level of aperture bias as the combination of two effects: (i) more luminous galaxies at the same distance will have larger apparent sizes, and so the fraction of flux covered by the SDSS fibres will be reduced and (ii) low‐luminosity galaxies tend to be either late‐type spirals or dwarf ellipticals and hence do not have such significant radial gradients in their SFRs. The luminosity function of early‐type spirals (Sa+b) for which aperture biases are by far the most important has a Gaussian distribution centred at M r =−21.7 and width σ∼ 0.9 mag (de Lapparent 2003), and hence are rare at M r ≳−20.…”
Section: Aperture Biases In the Sdss Spectroscopic Samplementioning
confidence: 99%