2002
DOI: 10.1127/arch.moll/131/2002/167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical analysis of subgeneric taxa of the Subfamily Caecinae (Caenogastropoda: Caecidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the diagnostic spiral growth pattern in the larval and juvenile shell of Meioceras (Bandel 1996) might not be used for unambiguous discrimination as our phylogeny indicates that such patterns have evolved independently at least two times within the genus Caecum. The bulbous adult shell with an oblique constricted aperture was thought to develop from the preceding ontogenesis of a helicoidal shell section, observable at the beginning of the second growth stages (De Folin 1880;Absalão and Pizzini 2002). This diagnosis has been problematic because in the past other species (Absalão and Pizzini 2002) that also express a similar shell-shape had been classified as Caecum due to a lack of observations of the juvenile stadia or the lack of the afore-mentioned growth pattern (e.g., Caecum ryssotitum, Bandel 1996).…”
Section: Taxonomic Consequences For Caecidae and The Fate Of Meiocerasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the diagnostic spiral growth pattern in the larval and juvenile shell of Meioceras (Bandel 1996) might not be used for unambiguous discrimination as our phylogeny indicates that such patterns have evolved independently at least two times within the genus Caecum. The bulbous adult shell with an oblique constricted aperture was thought to develop from the preceding ontogenesis of a helicoidal shell section, observable at the beginning of the second growth stages (De Folin 1880;Absalão and Pizzini 2002). This diagnosis has been problematic because in the past other species (Absalão and Pizzini 2002) that also express a similar shell-shape had been classified as Caecum due to a lack of observations of the juvenile stadia or the lack of the afore-mentioned growth pattern (e.g., Caecum ryssotitum, Bandel 1996).…”
Section: Taxonomic Consequences For Caecidae and The Fate Of Meiocerasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… aeèçíåííîì öèêëå ìîëëþñêîâ ðàçíûõ âèäîâ ñåìåéñòâà Caecidae íàáëþäàåòñÿ îò 4 äî 6 ñòàäèé ðîñòà. Âçðîñëûå ðàêîâèíû íà ðàçíûõ ñòàäèÿõ ðîñòà, êàê ïðàâèëî, èìåþò íåáîëüøèå ðàçëè÷èÿ â ðàçìåðàõ è ôîðìå, à èíîãäà è â ñêóëüïòóðå (Bandel, 1996;Absalão, Gomes, 2001;Absalão, Pizzini, 2002). Îäíàêî åäèíñòâåííûì ñòàáèëüíûì òàêñîíî-ìè÷åñêèì ïðèçíàêîì ðàêîâèí âçðîñëûõ ìîëëþñêîâ ÿâëÿåòñÿ ñòðîåíèå ìóêðî âûñòóïà â çàäíåé ÷àñòè ðàêîâèíû.…”
Section: ââåäåíèåunclassified
“…Ñëåäóåò îòìåòèòü, ÷òî îòå÷åñòâåííûå ó÷åíûå ðàññìàòðèâàþò Brochina Gray, 1873 è Fartulum Carpenter, 1857 êàê ðîäû (Ãîëèêîâ, Ñêàðëàòî, 1967; Âîëîâà è äð., 1979; Àäðèàíîâ, Êóñàêèí, 1998; Ãóëüáèí, 2004), òîãäà êàê çàðóáåaeíûå àâòîðû ïðèäàþò èì ñòàòóñ ïîäðîäîâ è âêëþ÷àþò â áîëüøîé ðîä Caecum (Bandel, 1996;Absalão, Gomes, 2001;Absalão, Pizzini 2002).…”
Section: ââåäåíèåunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For information regarding growth morphology and septum formation, see Pizzini et al (1998) and Lima et al (2013), for classification, see Bandel (1996) and Absalão & Pizzini (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%