Advanced Evoked Potentials 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-9007-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Analysis of Pattern Evoked Potential Recording Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… MwoA, Migraine without aura; MiA, migraine with aura; TH, tension-type headache; HA, non-migrainous headache; CO, healthy controls; ME, migraine equivalents; P1, P100; N1, N70; N2, N145; TIA, transitory vertebrobasilar ischaemic attacks. ∗ Mean age (or range) for patients. Check angle = 60 × ′cpd/(2√2) (45). † Binocular, monocular, full-field and half-field. Oz, 10/20 system or 2.5 cm above inion; 5 cm above inion, LO/RO: 5 cm lateral to MO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… MwoA, Migraine without aura; MiA, migraine with aura; TH, tension-type headache; HA, non-migrainous headache; CO, healthy controls; ME, migraine equivalents; P1, P100; N1, N70; N2, N145; TIA, transitory vertebrobasilar ischaemic attacks. ∗ Mean age (or range) for patients. Check angle = 60 × ′cpd/(2√2) (45). † Binocular, monocular, full-field and half-field. Oz, 10/20 system or 2.5 cm above inion; 5 cm above inion, LO/RO: 5 cm lateral to MO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why did we not find similar control group habituation with the 33′ check stimulus? While larger check stimuli mainly activate the magnocellular (Y) motion/luminance channel, smaller checks also activate the parvocellular (X) contrast/contour type visual channel (45), and it is probable that habituation is more closely related to the latter visual pathway (14). Ôelkers et al (14) found increased N2 latency in VEP evoked by small checks in migraine and they attributed this finding to a Y system predominance in the migraine interval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective for the present study was to study VEP amplitude and habituation to medium and large checks in order to explore whether magnocellular and parvocellular visual networks (11) are differentially altered in migraine. In addition, we intended to investigate if check‐size‐related VEP differences in migraine change with time to the next attack, because electrophysiological changes in contingent negative variation (CNV; 12), electroencephalogram (EEG; 13) and VEP (2, 6, 10) have been found in the preattack period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%