2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2009000400012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical analysis of autoregressive and fast Fourier transform markers of cardiovascular variability in rats and humans

Abstract: The autonomic nervous system plays an important role in physiological and pathological conditions, and has been extensively evaluated by parametric and non-parametric spectral analysis. To compare the results obtained with fast Fourier transform (FFT) and the autoregressive (AR) method, we performed a comprehensive comparative study using data from humans and rats during pharmacological blockade (in rats), a postural test (in humans), and in the hypertensive state (in both humans and rats). Although postural h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indices were determined by the AR method demonstrating that model orders from 9 to 25 produce similar results. According to the Task Force (1996), results of FFT analyses are comparable to those of AR (Task Force, 1996), although more recent work is characterized by disagreement in adult populations (Silva et al, 2009) and even in 5-month-old infants (Poliakova et al, 2014). There are some possible explanations for these discrepancies including preprocessing steps, such as interpolation and de-trending, as well as the processing itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indices were determined by the AR method demonstrating that model orders from 9 to 25 produce similar results. According to the Task Force (1996), results of FFT analyses are comparable to those of AR (Task Force, 1996), although more recent work is characterized by disagreement in adult populations (Silva et al, 2009) and even in 5-month-old infants (Poliakova et al, 2014). There are some possible explanations for these discrepancies including preprocessing steps, such as interpolation and de-trending, as well as the processing itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSA corresponds to the respiratory frequency, 0.15–0.4 Hz, equivalent to the HF band range. Low frequency (LF: 0.04–0.15 Hz) HRV is thought to reflect both sympathetic and parasympathetic effects on HRV (Berntson et al, 1997; Silva et al, 2009). Less is known about the controlling factors of very low frequency (VLF: 0.0033–0.04 Hz) HRV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rats, the components of VLF to HF of HRV power spectra vary between 0.0 and 3.0 Hz (Task force, 1996; Baltatu et al, 2001; Bezerra et al, 2001; Ushizima et al, 2001; Silva et al, 2009), while in mice, the components of LF to HF vary between 0.1 and 5.0 Hz (Ishii et al, 1996; Joaquim et al, 2004; Baudrie et al, 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%