2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2017.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical analysis of adsorption/diffusion modelling as a function of time square root

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An adhesion kinetics with a square root dependence on time, i.e., ∝ t 1/2 , is indicative of a diffusion-controlled process, which occurs when there is no energy barrier for adhesion. Alternatively, the activation energy of adhesion is comparable with the thermal energy, k B T where k B is the Boltzmann constant and T is the absolute temperature 90 92 . Considering the zeta potential of bacteria (−37.1 mV for S .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An adhesion kinetics with a square root dependence on time, i.e., ∝ t 1/2 , is indicative of a diffusion-controlled process, which occurs when there is no energy barrier for adhesion. Alternatively, the activation energy of adhesion is comparable with the thermal energy, k B T where k B is the Boltzmann constant and T is the absolute temperature 90 92 . Considering the zeta potential of bacteria (−37.1 mV for S .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained show that for sample and sample-Cl , the isosteric heats are constant with loading, increasing at low loading in the case of sample-Na and sample-S . Schwaab et al 46 reported that the evolution of the isosteric heats with adsorbate loading can be related to the energetically homogeneous/heterogeneous character of the adsorbents. In the case of sample and sample-Cl , the samples are energetically homogeneous toward CO 2 adsorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e nonappearance of such feature points to that the experimental data do not t the intraparticle di usion model because of low values of R 2 ≤ 93, in comparison with the high values of R 2 estimated from the pseudo-second-order model and the intraparticle di usion was not only the limiting control step. Moreover, the plot does not pass through the origin, indicating that the rst stage of this plot involved boundary layer adsorption [42]. …”
Section: Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%