2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-015-0548-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical analysis of a coaxial configuration for the characterization of adhesive wear and its application to Al and Al–Sn alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies [25,26] showed a direct relation between the roughness parameters and the size of the wear track for materials with similar constitutive elements as is the case of commercially pure aluminum, recrystallized SAE783 and cold rolled SAE783. As mentioned above, Rabinowicz [30,31] reported lower tribological compatibility between the tribopair Al-Fe than between Cu-Fe, attributing the higher adhesion to the higher the solubility observed in the binary phase diagram, this was studied deeper by Sliding direction is perpendicular to the image Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies [25,26] showed a direct relation between the roughness parameters and the size of the wear track for materials with similar constitutive elements as is the case of commercially pure aluminum, recrystallized SAE783 and cold rolled SAE783. As mentioned above, Rabinowicz [30,31] reported lower tribological compatibility between the tribopair Al-Fe than between Cu-Fe, attributing the higher adhesion to the higher the solubility observed in the binary phase diagram, this was studied deeper by Sliding direction is perpendicular to the image Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the present research, a coaxial tribometer [25,26] based on the geometry proposed in [27,28] is used to generate a tribolayer under dry friction conditions. The materials tested are SAE783 alloy (Al 20% Sn 1% Cu) and C11000 Cu alloy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is at least partially due to a difference in application. Here, the development of the analysis was guided by the study of strain hardening during wear of metallic materials [27][28][29][30]. For bulk metallic materials, the elastic properties are generally well known and show almost insignificant influence of thermal and mechanical processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study is motivated by research in the Al-Sn system which is widely used for the journal bearings of compact combustion engines. The alloy is used in a bilayer with a steel sheet backing and is modified superficially when exposed to wear [27][28][29][30], which makes tensile testing impractical (although free-standing sheet can be easily produced for research purposes). Existing methods for the analysis of tensile properties through indentation testing [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] are not applicable to this material due to a viscous component in the total strain [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved in processes such as Surface mechanical attrition [ 4 , 5 , 6 ], large strain machining [ 7 ], ultrasonic surface modification [ 8 ], high-speed pounding [ 9 , 10 ] or sliding contact modification [ 11 , 12 ]. The coaxial configuration proposed by Figueroa et al [ 13 ] for the analysis of adhesive wear induces significant surface modification as well and was, independently, modified as Surface Spinning Strengthening by Ren et al [ 14 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%