2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criterion validity of 3D trunk accelerations to assess external work and power in able-bodied gait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, test-retest reliability for acceleration measures during gait has been proven to be high, with ICCs between 0.79 and 0.93 and CVs between 2.88 percent and 6.8 percent [15,20]. Meichtry et al reported high correlations (r > 0.82) for P values derived from trunk accelerometry and force plate measurements during gait and concluded the accelerometer is a valid measurement tool [18].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, test-retest reliability for acceleration measures during gait has been proven to be high, with ICCs between 0.79 and 0.93 and CVs between 2.88 percent and 6.8 percent [15,20]. Meichtry et al reported high correlations (r > 0.82) for P values derived from trunk accelerometry and force plate measurements during gait and concluded the accelerometer is a valid measurement tool [18].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…High reproducibility has been found using trunk accelerometry for the measurement of spatiotemporal gait parameters [14][15] and accelerations during gait [15,20]. In addition, Meichtry et al reported high validity for quantifying P using trunk accelerometry and force plate measurements during gait [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternative techniques include the use of pressure sensitive insole systems 21 or instrumented shoes 22 . These systems allow for the direct measurement of contact forces on structures but generally only yield the vertical component and do not capture the global body behavior, e.g., the trunk motion 20 . Another ambulant technique employs combined magnetic-inertial sensors, i.e., accelerometry 20,23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems allow for the direct measurement of contact forces on structures but generally only yield the vertical component and do not capture the global body behavior, e.g., the trunk motion 20 . Another ambulant technique employs combined magnetic-inertial sensors, i.e., accelerometry 20,23 . Although this wireless technology is also encountering some challenges (e.g., soft-tissue artefacts 24 , connectivity, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%