2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criterion validity and between-day reliability of an inertial-sensor-based trunk postural stability test during unstable sitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
41
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This study has focused on pain-free participants. Although reliability is affected by the heterogeneity of study populations (Lariviere et al, 2013), the inclusion of pain-free participants was reasonable to evaluate the usability of an IMU system to measure trunk kinematics.…”
Section: Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has focused on pain-free participants. Although reliability is affected by the heterogeneity of study populations (Lariviere et al, 2013), the inclusion of pain-free participants was reasonable to evaluate the usability of an IMU system to measure trunk kinematics.…”
Section: Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other seated balance set-ups have the ability to regulate test difficulty by changing the radius of the hemisphere (Cholewicki et al, 2000; Radebold et al, 2001; Reeves et al, 2008; van Dieën et al, 2010b) or by changing the position of the springs used to provide rotational stiffness (Larivière et al, 2015, 2013; Lee and Granata, 2008; Oomen et al, 2015). This adjustment, however, often requires the subject to be removed from the seat, and in the case of the hemisphere, has less resolution in changing the test difficulty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last three (full) trials were used for analysis in this study. According to Larivière et al (2013), three trials provided acceptable reliability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The angular position was then used to calculate the average angular velocity of the stick x, by calculating the total angular path traveled during the trial divided by the duration of the trial (20 s). The use of average angular velocity was chosen given its established reliability in assessing human motor control (Cholewicki, Polzhofer, & Radebold, 2000;Lariviere, Mecheri, Shahvarpour, Gagnon, & Shirazi-Adl, 2013). To allow for comparisons with the previous stick balancing experiment the average angular velocity was converted into frequency using f = x/2p.…”
Section: Signal Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%