2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevx.5.041047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criterion for Many-Body Localization-Delocalization Phase Transition

Abstract: We propose a new approach to probing ergodicity and its breakdown in one-dimensional quantum manybody systems based on their response to a local perturbation. We study the distribution of matrix elements of a local operator between the system's eigenstates, finding a qualitatively different behavior in the manybody localized (MBL) and ergodic phases. To characterize how strongly a local perturbation modifies the eigenstates, we introduce the parameter GðLÞ ¼ hlnðV nm =δÞi, which represents the disorder-average… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
300
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(317 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
16
300
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1) that indicates the location of the ETH-MBL transition as a function of energy density and disorder strength. It is in good agreement with results obtained using conventional methods [18,36,43,49]. This paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) that indicates the location of the ETH-MBL transition as a function of energy density and disorder strength. It is in good agreement with results obtained using conventional methods [18,36,43,49]. This paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…(8)], which is designed to favor networks which confidently classify transition region states, makes physical sense and is essential to make contact with established methods. We note that by refining and combining conventional methods [18,36,43,49] the same or better classification success can be achieved. However, here we want to point out that there is no equally simple method, assuming as little prior knowledge, that performs equally well as the machine learning based approach.…”
Section: B Single Disorder Realizationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the present case, the variable w n introduced in Eq. 21 involving the matrix element of the local operator I between two consecutive eigenstates has been studied in detail in Ref [26] in terms of the notation…”
Section: Scaling With the System Size L Of The Amplitudes Of The Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This form holds for matrix elements of local operators in a finite-size, ETH system [9,45]. The renormalization of intercluster couplings is different from those of [37,38] Approximating Γ ij by the limiting MBL and ETH forms becomes self-consistently justified since the width of the distribution of resonance parameters g ij = Γ ij /∆E ij [37,38,47] increases with each RG step. In an infinite critical system, the width of the distribution of g increases without bound along the RG flow so that one asymptotically encounters only the cases g 1 (MBL) or g 1 (ETH) and almost never faces marginal cases where g ≈ 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%