1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(96)00474-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria of choice of the front-end transistor for low-noise preamplification of detector signals at sub-microsecond shaping times for X- and γ-ray spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dielectric noise of a photodiode X-ray spectrometer arises from any lossy dielectrics at the input of the preamplifier, such as the feedback capacitance, the passivation and packaging of the input JFET, the JFET dielectrics, as well as the detector itself and its packaging. [37][38][39] The known dependency of the dielectric noise on the temperature 34 explained the reduction of the dielectric noise as the temperature decreased for both spectrometers, S1 and S2. Also, the greater dielectric noise of the X-ray spectrometer S2 (with D2, 400 lm diameter device) compared to the spectrometer S1 (with D1, 200 lm diameter device) was attributed to the higher capacitance of D2 compared to D1, since the dielectric noise is directly proportional to the capacitance of the lossy dielectrics.…”
Section: B Noise Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The dielectric noise of a photodiode X-ray spectrometer arises from any lossy dielectrics at the input of the preamplifier, such as the feedback capacitance, the passivation and packaging of the input JFET, the JFET dielectrics, as well as the detector itself and its packaging. [37][38][39] The known dependency of the dielectric noise on the temperature 34 explained the reduction of the dielectric noise as the temperature decreased for both spectrometers, S1 and S2. Also, the greater dielectric noise of the X-ray spectrometer S2 (with D2, 400 lm diameter device) compared to the spectrometer S1 (with D1, 200 lm diameter device) was attributed to the higher capacitance of D2 compared to D1, since the dielectric noise is directly proportional to the capacitance of the lossy dielectrics.…”
Section: B Noise Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The electronic noise consists of parallel white noise, series white noise, 1/f noise, and dielectric noise. 32,33 The parallel white noise takes into account the leakage currents of the detector and input junction field-effect transistor (JFET) of the preamplifier, whilst the series white noise takes into account the capacitances of the detector and input JFET of the preamplifier. The parallel white noise, series white noise, and 1/f noise were calculated for the reported detectors.…”
Section: B X-ray Spectroscopy and Noise Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FWHM at 5.9 keV experimentally observed at 20 °C was greater than the Fano limited resolution, this highlighted that there was a significant contribution from at least one of the other noise sources. The electronic noise, due to the Al0.52In0.48P photodiode and the preamplifier, consists of parallel white noise, series white noise, induced gate current noise, 1/f noise and dielectric noise [25,27,28]. The parallel white noise takes into account the leakage currents of the detector and input JFET of the preamplifier, it is directly proportional to the shaping time.…”
Section: B X-ray Spectroscopy and Noise Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The series white noise power spectral density can be approximated to the thermal noise of the JFET drain current when stray resistance in series with the JFET gate is negligible. The series white noise was calculated using the capacitance and was adjusted for induced gate current noise [25,27]. 1/f noise is instead independent from the shaping time.…”
Section: B X-ray Spectroscopy and Noise Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation