1976
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1976.03260440063033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for the Recognition of Pulmonary Emboli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ECGs were evaluated blindly by an internist. ECG patterns suggestive of PE were defined as highly suggestive and non-specific (8). The highly suggestive signs were: inverted T wave in Vl-V4; right bundle branch block (especially if transient); S1Q3 or S I S~S~ pattern; right axis deviation; signs of right ventricular hypertrophy; tall and peaked P waves in leads 11,111 and aVF.…”
Section: Electrocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECGs were evaluated blindly by an internist. ECG patterns suggestive of PE were defined as highly suggestive and non-specific (8). The highly suggestive signs were: inverted T wave in Vl-V4; right bundle branch block (especially if transient); S1Q3 or S I S~S~ pattern; right axis deviation; signs of right ventricular hypertrophy; tall and peaked P waves in leads 11,111 and aVF.…”
Section: Electrocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%