2019
DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no2.213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for Supplier Selection in Textile and Apparel Industry : A Case Study in Vietnam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results have revealed that supplier selection affects the textile SCRES, although it has the lowest total effect among the four inbound logistics components in the model. This finding is in line with the research of Nong and Ho (2019), who stated that only 2% of supplier selection studies were from the textile sector. In fact, the textile industry in Vietnam is still heavily dependent on foreign material supply, accounting for nearly 88% of the total demand (Wang et al , 2020).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results have revealed that supplier selection affects the textile SCRES, although it has the lowest total effect among the four inbound logistics components in the model. This finding is in line with the research of Nong and Ho (2019), who stated that only 2% of supplier selection studies were from the textile sector. In fact, the textile industry in Vietnam is still heavily dependent on foreign material supply, accounting for nearly 88% of the total demand (Wang et al , 2020).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In an emerging market (Vietnam), the best selection of suitable suppliers in this sector has been the concern of many practitioners that is affected by many unpredictable and uncertain issues [82]. Textile and apparel companies should determine the best supplier selection based on sourcing country, organization features (i.e., relationship, capability, and company's image) and performance metrics (i.e., quality, costs, delivery, and service) [83].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literatürde yapılan çalışmalar incelendiğinde birbirinden farklı pek çok seçim kriterinin kullanıldığı görülmektedir. Bu kriterler; kalite, maliyet, teslim süresi (Öztürk, 2019), esneklik, güvenilirlik, fiyat, mali durum, coğrafi konum, teknik kapasite, garanti politikaları (K. Kara, Koleoglu, & Gurol, 2016), teslimat güvencesi, üretim kapasitesi, çevre yönetim planı, taşıma koşulları (Karami, Ghasemy Yaghin & Mousazadegan, 2021), iyileştirme programı, teknoloji kapasitesi (Celik, Yucesan & Gul, 2021), yenilik (Köprülü & Albayrakoğlu, 2007), firma itibarı (Cebeci, 2009), ikili ilişkiler, tam zamanında teslimat (Nong & Ho, 2019), hata oranı, ticaret kısıtlaması, kapasite, stok durumu, müşteri hizmetleri (Zarbini-Sydani, Karbasi, & Atef-Yekta, 2011), tecrübe (Yücenur, Vayvay, & Demirel, 2011), gelecek stratejisi (Ünal & Güner, 2009), satış sonrası servis (Nong & Ho, 2019), ürün yelpazesi (Stojanov & Ding, 2015), servis kalitesi, müşteri memnuniyeti (Li, Diabat & Lu, 2020), bilgi paylaşımı, pazarlık edilebilirlik (Chan & Chan, 2010), tedarikçi performansı (Paksoy & Güleş, 2006), işlevsellik (Cebeci, 2009), uygulama yaklaşımı, müşteri odaklılık (Ünal & Güner, 2009), geçmiş performans (Amindoust & Saghafinia, 2017), paketleme performansı (Ayyıldız & Çetin Demirel, 2010), kalite sertifikasyonu, ham madde durumu (Chan & Chan, 2010), yönetim sistemi (Güngör, Coşkun, Durur, & Gören, 2010), çözüm odaklılık (Güneri, Ertay, & Yücel, 2011), teslimat miktarı (İ. Kara & Ecer, 2016), stok düzeyinin düşürülmesi (Kumar, Singh, Singh, & Seema, 2013), tam zamanlı üretim, ülkenin politik durumu, döviz durumu (Karami, Ghasemy Yaghin & Mousazadegan, 2021), uzlaşma yeteneği, renk tonu özelliği, mesafe (Paksoy & Güleş, 2006), destek, örgütsel güvenilirlik (Ünal & Güner, 2009), kullanım kola...…”
Section: Li̇teratür Taramasiunclassified