2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.11.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for saturated magnetization loop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, the effect is not supposed to be attributed to erroneously measuring minor loops due to insufficient intensity of saturation field, a problem which is known from several systems in experiment and theory. [18][19][20] Here, the risk of not reaching a saturated state was eliminated by measuring in fields up to 0.5 T which is nearly ten times higher than average coercive fields detected for this sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Importantly, the effect is not supposed to be attributed to erroneously measuring minor loops due to insufficient intensity of saturation field, a problem which is known from several systems in experiment and theory. [18][19][20] Here, the risk of not reaching a saturated state was eliminated by measuring in fields up to 0.5 T which is nearly ten times higher than average coercive fields detected for this sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The asymmetric behavior sometimes is caused by the minor loop due to the unsaturated magnetization measurement. 16,17 In order to exclude this probability, the second derivatives of the respective descending and ascending branches of the field cooled MH for negative fields are calculated and shown in Fig. 3(b).…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second derivatives of the two branches are overlap when the field is higher than 40 kOe, indicating a saturated loop here. 16 Therefore, this asymmetric behavior is caused by the existence of EB effect in SCO2.29. Usually, the critical parameters of EB effect are exchange bias field H EB and coercivity field H C , which can be defined as H EB = | H 1 + H 2 |/2, and H C = | H 1 H 2 |/2, respectively, where H 1 and H 2 are left and right coercive fields.…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with the strong evidence of SG coupling, we cannot discount the possibility that there is also direct coupling between NiFe 2 O 4 and NiO in this sample, where the Néel temperature (T N ) of NiO has been supressed below 300 K due to finite size effects. The extent to which T N is reduced has been debated in the literature and the large variance in degree appears to stem from measurement technique (i.e., electron spin resonance [46], low field ZFC magnetic susceptibility [47], neutron diffraction [48] and muon spin relaxation/rotation [49]), identity of the antiferromagnet, and particle size and shape [49].…”
Section: Magnetic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the origin of the EB effect in this case is most likely due to coupling between NiFe 2 O 4 (FiM) and NiO (AFM). EB is unlikely to appear in a bulk system where NiO is the AFM without FC through T N of NiO (525 K); however, when the NiO grains are confined to the nanoscale, a reduction in T N may be observed [48,50].…”
Section: Magnetic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%