Criteria for Identifying and Evaluating Candidate Sites for Open-Field Trials of Genetically Engineered Mosquitoes

Abstract

Recent laboratory successes in the development of genetically engineered mosquitoes for controlling pathogen transmission have fostered the need for standardized procedures for advancing the technical achievements to practical tools. It is incumbent in many cases for the same scientists doing the in-laboratory discovery research to also take on the initial challenges of developing the pathway that will move the technologies to the field. One of these challenges is having a set of criteria for selecting collaborators and sites for efficacy and safety field trials that combine rigorous science with good ethical and legal practices. Specific site-selection criteria were developed in four categories-Scientific, Regulatory, Community Engagement, and Resources-in anticipation of open-field releases of a transgenic mosquito strain designed to suppress populations of the dengue vector mosquito, Aedes aegypti. The criteria are derived from previous published material, discussions, and personal experiences with the expectation of providing guidance to laboratory scientists for addressing the conceptual and operational considerations for identifying partner researchers and countries with whom to collaborate. These criteria are not intended to be prescriptive nor can they be applied to every circumstance where genetic approaches are proposed for deployment. However, we encourage those involved in the discovery phase of research to consider each criterion during project planning activities, and where appropriate, incorporate them into a ''go/no-go'' decision-making process for further development and testing of the technologies.

Highly efficient Cas9-mediated gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquitoAnopheles stephensi

“…Effector gene stability in different genetic backgrounds and under diverse environmental conditions and efficacy against genetically diverse parasites need further research to ensure that the constructs function as well in the field as they do in the laboratory. In addition, significant advances in regulatory structures and ethical models of community engagement are as important as the further scientific development of these technologies (7,42,43). It is incumbent on the scientist developing these technologies to interact openly and freely with the potential end users.…”

Seasonal variation in size estimates of Aedes albopictus population based on standard mark–release–recapture experiments in an urban area on Reunion Island

“…Additionally, implicit in the optimal spatial release of sterile insects is the necessity of estimating the carrying capacity for the wild populations in the natural environment and the associated spatial movement through dispersal ability Brown et al, 2014), among other relevant features. Indeed, one of the critical parameters for SIT deployment is to find threshold values for the population density that determine the appropriate time to treat and the number of sterilized males that must be released to achieve a desired goal (Jeffery et al, 2009).…”

Rules of the road for insect gene drive research and testing

“…Technical guidance is only part of the picture. There is a critical need for guidance on best practices for community engagement, consolidating and expanding lessons learned from the case studies to date 9–11 .…”