2022
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-2022-1064
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria-based visualization design for hazard maps

Abstract: Abstract. Probabilistic seismic hazard estimates are a key ingredient of earthquake risk mitigation strategies and are often communicated through seismic hazard maps. Though the literature suggests that visual design properties are key for effective communication using such maps, guidelines on how to optimally design hazard map are missing from the literature. Current maps use color palettes and data classification schemes which have well-reported limitations that may inadvertently miscommunicate seismic hazar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the ubiquity of location-related use cases shortly after a large earthquake, maps were seen as an immediate need directly after the mainshock, along with simplified statements that put the most important hazard first, e.g., by describing the probability of strong shaking. Strategic use of colors that connote risk (e.g., red) may assist users to quickly understand the critical spatial patterns, as supported by prior visualization research [Schneider et al, 2023]. Both shaking intensity level maps and probability of exceedance maps were seen as useful, as has been found for volcanic risk visualization [Thompson et al, 2015], though perhaps the former is more useful soon after the mainshock than the latter.…”
Section: Practical Implications and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the ubiquity of location-related use cases shortly after a large earthquake, maps were seen as an immediate need directly after the mainshock, along with simplified statements that put the most important hazard first, e.g., by describing the probability of strong shaking. Strategic use of colors that connote risk (e.g., red) may assist users to quickly understand the critical spatial patterns, as supported by prior visualization research [Schneider et al, 2023]. Both shaking intensity level maps and probability of exceedance maps were seen as useful, as has been found for volcanic risk visualization [Thompson et al, 2015], though perhaps the former is more useful soon after the mainshock than the latter.…”
Section: Practical Implications and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Guidance does exist for visualizing seismic hazards in general [Schneider et al, 2023] and other natural hazards (e.g., Thyng et al [2016]). However, these guidelines make no connection to the needs of users of this information, nor are they evaluated by such users.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To design user-centred products, testing is indispensable (Dallo et al, 2022a;Karjack et al, 2022;Marti et al, 2023;Schneider et al, 2022). The earthquake hazard and risk maps of Europe were two of the main products that were also integrated into many other products (e.g., flyers, posters).…”
Section: The Design and Testing Of The Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earthquake hazard and risk maps of Europe were two of the main products that were also integrated into many other products (e.g., flyers, posters). Maps are commonly used to communicate spatial hazard and risk but are only an appropriate format if they are well designed (Marti et al, 2019;Schneider et al, 2022). Experiences show that colour scales are often chosen based on subjective preferences and not empirical evidence (Thompson et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Design and Testing Of The Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation