2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critères d’acceptabilité et de faisabilité de l’hystérectomie en ambulatoire, enquête auprès de 152 chirurgiens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These investigations align with physician perspectives of barriers to SDD in patients with OSA, suggesting that SDD is more difficult in this population, particularly without pre-surgical screening and treatment. Similarly, in a survey of French gynecologic surgeons, 77% of responding surgeons rated no history of OSA as the criteria for appropriateness of an outpatient hysterectomy, corroborating this study's finding of OSA as a perceived barrier to successful SDD [29]. As referenced by the physicians, patients that are non-adherent to therapy pose a similar post-surgical risk of needing additional oxygen therapy to those undiagnosed at the time of surgery.…”
Section: Interpretation Within the Context Of The Wider Literaturesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…These investigations align with physician perspectives of barriers to SDD in patients with OSA, suggesting that SDD is more difficult in this population, particularly without pre-surgical screening and treatment. Similarly, in a survey of French gynecologic surgeons, 77% of responding surgeons rated no history of OSA as the criteria for appropriateness of an outpatient hysterectomy, corroborating this study's finding of OSA as a perceived barrier to successful SDD [29]. As referenced by the physicians, patients that are non-adherent to therapy pose a similar post-surgical risk of needing additional oxygen therapy to those undiagnosed at the time of surgery.…”
Section: Interpretation Within the Context Of The Wider Literaturesupporting
confidence: 75%