2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crisscross differential evolution algorithm for constrained hydrothermal scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 benchmark function and three CHPED problems 5 [25] Improved genetic algorithm using novel crossover and mutation (IGA-NCM) -6 [32] Learner nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-RL) 10 famous multi-objective functions 7 [33] Chaotic-crisscross differential evolution (CCDE) Generalized test functions and two practical hydrothermal system problems 8 [34] Differential evolution algorithm (DEA) IEEE-30 bus system 9 [35] Dynamic economic emission dispatching based on WEV system (WE_DEED) 10 unit systems.…”
Section: Sr Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 benchmark function and three CHPED problems 5 [25] Improved genetic algorithm using novel crossover and mutation (IGA-NCM) -6 [32] Learner nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-RL) 10 famous multi-objective functions 7 [33] Chaotic-crisscross differential evolution (CCDE) Generalized test functions and two practical hydrothermal system problems 8 [34] Differential evolution algorithm (DEA) IEEE-30 bus system 9 [35] Dynamic economic emission dispatching based on WEV system (WE_DEED) 10 unit systems.…”
Section: Sr Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jian et al [14] used logarithmic scale mixed integer linear programming [15] to better describe STHTS. To solve this issue, Yin et al [15] used crisscross optimization [16]. Kaur et al [16], used crisscross differential evolution to perform hydrothermal scheduling.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertical crossover is to exchange the dimensional information of a single search agent, which can facilitate escaping from the stagnancy in local optima without destroying other dimensions that may be the global optimum. Considering the advantages of CSO, some papers tried to apply this algorithm on handling complex problems [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. In addition, the excellent search capability of the two crossover operators can exactly make up for the deficiencies of HHO mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%