2015
DOI: 10.1093/database/bav055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CrisprGE: a central hub of CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing

Abstract: CRISPR system is a powerful defense mechanism in bacteria and archaea to provide immunity against viruses. Recently, this process found a new application in intended targeting of the genomes. CRISPR-mediated genome editing is performed by two main components namely single guide RNA and Cas9 protein. Despite the enormous data generated in this area, there is a dearth of high throughput resource. Therefore, we have developed CrisprGE, a central hub of CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing. Presently, this database hol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, shortening the guide further to 14-nt or 15-nt creates a ‘dead guide’ that can mediate efficient wild-type Cas9 binding without nuclease activation, enabling multiplexed applications of DNA cleavage and targeted effector activity (Dahlman et al, 2015; Kiani et al, 2015). This engineered guide approach benefited from insight into the mechanism of Cas9 cleavage, which has been shown to require near-complete strand invasion and complementarity (Figure 1).…”
Section: Modified Guidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, shortening the guide further to 14-nt or 15-nt creates a ‘dead guide’ that can mediate efficient wild-type Cas9 binding without nuclease activation, enabling multiplexed applications of DNA cleavage and targeted effector activity (Dahlman et al, 2015; Kiani et al, 2015). This engineered guide approach benefited from insight into the mechanism of Cas9 cleavage, which has been shown to require near-complete strand invasion and complementarity (Figure 1).…”
Section: Modified Guidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research community could begin to report guide RNA on- and off-target activity to shared databases, like EENdb (Xiao et al, 2013) or CrisprGE (Kaur et al, 2015). Such standardized information, in combination with continued progress in off-target detection methods and Cas9 optimization, could greatly improve guide selection, enable fair comparison and benchmarking across publications while ultimately enabling precise and safe genome-editing.…”
Section: The Need For Standardizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRISPR screening derived from publications or by directed submission is integrated with data from various sources (14,17,18). Screening data is then visualized characteristics of CRISPR reagents and screens.…”
Section: Data Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several resources have been established to address this need. These include CRISPRz (12), a database of sgRNAs validated in zebrafish, WGE (13), a data resource that contains information about sgRNAs that can be used to target genes of interest and CrisprGE (14), a platform that provides knowledge about sequence mutations caused by sgRNAs previously used in various experimental settings. Nevertheless, a database that allows to compare screening results, such as perturbation phenotypes or sgRNA efficiency, of many different experiments on a genome-wide scale has so far not been available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online resources, such as CRISPR-PLANT (Xie et al, 2014), CRISPR-P 2.0 (Liu et al, 2017), Cas-Database (Park et al, 2016), CRISPR-GE (Xie et al, 2017), and Cpf1-Database (Park and Bae, 2018) allow researchers to design gRNAs with minimal off-target potential; however, these tools and databases are not designed to manage data or search for CRISPR-generated plant mutants. The database CrisprGE (Kaur et al, 2015) contains information about CRISPRmediated mutants that have been reported from both plants and other organisms, but currently provides little information about the transformation experiment, the variety used, the progeny derived, or seed availability. It is therefore needed to establish a database that will serve as a central repository to efficiently manage plant mutant data and to provide a platform for sharing the data and mutants with the research community, thereby saving time and making more efficient use of resources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%