2017
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPRcloud: a secure cloud-based pipeline for CRISPR pooled screen deconvolution

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently published tools for CRISPR pooled screen analysis, including CRISPRcloud (CC1) 27 , MAGeCK 25 , CarRpools 29 , CRISPRAnalyzeR 26 , and PinAPL-Py 28 , provide different methods for estimating the abundance of sgRNAs in each sample from pooled libraries. In most cases, input data consist of raw FASTQ-format sequencing result files.…”
Section: Algorithm For Quantifying Sgrna Abundance Previous Methods Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently published tools for CRISPR pooled screen analysis, including CRISPRcloud (CC1) 27 , MAGeCK 25 , CarRpools 29 , CRISPRAnalyzeR 26 , and PinAPL-Py 28 , provide different methods for estimating the abundance of sgRNAs in each sample from pooled libraries. In most cases, input data consist of raw FASTQ-format sequencing result files.…”
Section: Algorithm For Quantifying Sgrna Abundance Previous Methods Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, those analysis tools tend to be script-based because they were developed for bioinformaticians or scientists who are very computationally savvy. Of the newly-developed tools, the most user-friendly are CRISPRAnalyzeR 26 , CRISPRcloud 27 , and PinAPLPy 28 , as they have web-based interfaces and represents as a first-step toward enabling scientists who are actually generating the CRISPR/Cas9 screen data to analyze these large dataset. However, each of these tools have various of rate-limiting steps such as requiring intricate tuning of parameters for trimming and mapping data, long transfer times and file copying errors in the transfer of a large amount of sequence data over the internet, lack of fast and powerful statistical tools etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We had previously developed a web-based application called CRISPRcloud that could run any statistical testing and mapping algorithm through the cloud-based infrastructure provided by Amazon Web Service (AWS) (Jeong et al 2017). We implemented CB 2 in the platform and added new features to increase speed and data security (Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Cb 2 Provides More Accurate Alignment Without Parameter Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most pooled CRISPR screens have compared gRNA representation between two samples, it is also possible to have a multi-dimensional phenotypic readout, such as FACS-based sorting of multiple populations to determine relevant effect size or single-cell full transcriptome readout (Adamson et al, 2016; Datlinger et al, 2017; Dixit et al, 2016; Jaitin et al, 2016; Xie et al, 2017). Many different tools have been developed for analysis of gene-targeted screens and offer such features as automated determination of positively/negatively selected genes, pathway analysis, quality control analysis, and data visualization (Jeong et al, 2017; Li et al, 2014, 2015; List et al, 2016; Winter et al, 2016). …”
Section: Analysis Of Pooled Crispr Screensmentioning
confidence: 99%