2019
DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00007-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPR Interference for Rapid Knockdown of Essential Cell Cycle Genes inLactobacillus plantarum

Abstract: Studies of essential genes in bacteria are often hampered by the lack of accessible genetic tools. This is also the case for Lactobacillus plantarum, a key species in food and health applications. Here, we develop a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat interference (CRISPRi) system for knockdown of gene expression in L. plantarum. The two-plasmid CRISPRi system, in which a nuclease-inactivated Cas9 (dCas9) and a gene-specific single guide RNA (sgRNA) are expressed on separate plasmids, allo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar trends were reported for silencing assays using an antisense RNA approach in E. coli, where 65% silencing of ftsZ, encoding the central cell division protein was achieved which led to 50% reduction of the growth rate [54]. Furthermore, heterologous expression of the catalytically inactive CRISPR-dCas9 enzyme, was used to inhibit transcription of essential genes in other bacterial genera, such as Lactobacillus [24], Staphylococcus [55] or Mycobacterium [22], which again all showed strong growth retardation and a reduction in viability upon maximum silencing. Thus, the phenotypes observed in our survey of a hyperthermophilic archaeon are similar to findings in other mesophilic organisms where different silencing approaches were used to target essential genes.…”
Section: Successful Silencing Of Essential Genessupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar trends were reported for silencing assays using an antisense RNA approach in E. coli, where 65% silencing of ftsZ, encoding the central cell division protein was achieved which led to 50% reduction of the growth rate [54]. Furthermore, heterologous expression of the catalytically inactive CRISPR-dCas9 enzyme, was used to inhibit transcription of essential genes in other bacterial genera, such as Lactobacillus [24], Staphylococcus [55] or Mycobacterium [22], which again all showed strong growth retardation and a reduction in viability upon maximum silencing. Thus, the phenotypes observed in our survey of a hyperthermophilic archaeon are similar to findings in other mesophilic organisms where different silencing approaches were used to target essential genes.…”
Section: Successful Silencing Of Essential Genessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…For essential gene studies in eukaryotes and bacteria, mainly nuclease-inactive derivatives of DNA-targeting CRISPR type II and V proteins (i.e. dCas9 and ddCas12a) have been employed that, when expressed in trans, bind to the respective promoter or coding region to block transcription [22][23][24][25][26]. Similarly, a mutated variant of the DNA-targeting type I protein complex (CASCADE) deficient in Cas3 nuclease activity, was successfully harnessed to silence essential genes in a halophilic archaeon [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By directing dCas9 to the promoter region or 3′ end of a gene with a single guide RNA (sgRNA), the CRISPRi system can be used to transcriptionally control target gene expression ( 66 , 67 ). CRISPRi has been established in several organisms such as Escherichia coli , Lactobacillus plantarum , Bacillus subtilis , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Streptococcus pneumoniae , and V. cholerae and has been shown to be a useful tool to study essential genes ( 67 73 ). The CRISPRi technology is applicable to high-throughput screens as well and has other advantages particularly in the study of essential gene products compared to conventional knockdown methods ( 67 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to exogenous enzyme insertion, endogenous enzyme removal strategies can be random or targeted. Gene(s) knock-down (KD) strategies result in reduced activity of the glycosylation enzymes and can be achieved by gene(s) silencing techniques, such as RNA interference [162] or CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) [163]. However, gene(s) KD does not completely inactivate enzyme expression, often resulting in still high levels of the targeted undesired enzyme activity and consequently in the attachment of the unwanted immunogenic residues.…”
Section: Genetic Glyco-engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%