2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12033-019-00185-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPR–Cas9 System for Genome Engineering of Photosynthetic Microalgae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
24
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These problems can be overcome by the recently developed gene-editing techniques. Gene-editing techniques based on RNP using Cas9 proteins are being recognized as the most effective gene specific knockout methods to date (Patel et al, 2019). Cas9-mediated gene knock-out has been reported for several genes and the use of donor DNA with RNP, called knock-in, has emerged recently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems can be overcome by the recently developed gene-editing techniques. Gene-editing techniques based on RNP using Cas9 proteins are being recognized as the most effective gene specific knockout methods to date (Patel et al, 2019). Cas9-mediated gene knock-out has been reported for several genes and the use of donor DNA with RNP, called knock-in, has emerged recently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to change, remove or introduce gene(s) of interest in a programmable way, and to achieve a stable phenotype of the engineered strains over time, is pivotal to industrial application of photosynthetic bio-factories (Patel et al, 2019;Pérez et al, 2019). Molecular tools are better established for cyanobacteria than for eukaryotic algae, but nuclease-based genome editing tools like Clustered Regulatory Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 and Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALEN) are rapidly developing and applied to algal species of different phylogeny and commercial value (Doron et al, 2016;Nymark et al, 2016;Shin et al, 2016;Kroth et al, 2018;Verruto et al, 2018;Ortega-Escalante et al, 2019;Pérez et al, 2019;Ng et al, 2020).…”
Section: Molecular Biology Tools: State-of-the-art and Open Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such weaknesses have been mainly ascribed to positional effects of gene integration and/or gene silencing. Secondary off-target mutations in edited strains, even when targeted genome editing has been performed with nucleases (Patel et al, 2019), are an undesirable aspect of algae transformation. To minimize issues due to offtarget mutations, ribonucleoproteins (RNP-) based methods for CRISPR/Cas gene editing have been developed in substitution to vector-mediated protocols (Patel et al, 2019).…”
Section: Molecular Biology Tools: State-of-the-art and Open Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although genetic engineering of algae is still in the initial stages, the use of this technique to enhance lutein content in microalgae has made progress in recent years. For example, new molecular technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering technology and genome sequencing have improved understanding of lutein metabolism regulation in algae species [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%