2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated CCR5 Ablation in Human Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells Confers HIV-1 Resistance In Vivo

Abstract: Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) with a naturally occurring CCR5 mutation confers a loss of detectable HIV-1 in the patient, making ablation of the CCR5 gene in HSCs an ideal therapy for an HIV-1 cure. Although CCR5 disruption has been attempted in CD4 T cells and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), efficient gene editing with high specificity and long-term therapeutic potential remains a major challenge for clinical translation. Here, we established a CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
163
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(37 reference statements)
4
163
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several prior studies have also focused on knocking out the HIV co-receptors, CCR5 and CXCR4, as a means to block viral spread. As expected, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockout of the CCR5 gene inhibited HIV-1 infection in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived monocyte/macrophages [237], primary CD4+ T cells [238], and in vivo [239,240]. Similarly, CXCR4 knockout was shown to confer resistance to X4-tropic virus infection [241][242][243].…”
Section: Crisprsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Several prior studies have also focused on knocking out the HIV co-receptors, CCR5 and CXCR4, as a means to block viral spread. As expected, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockout of the CCR5 gene inhibited HIV-1 infection in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived monocyte/macrophages [237], primary CD4+ T cells [238], and in vivo [239,240]. Similarly, CXCR4 knockout was shown to confer resistance to X4-tropic virus infection [241][242][243].…”
Section: Crisprsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For example, a naturally occurring deletion in the CCR5 gene encoding an essential coreceptor of HIV confers resistance to HIV infection, providing the basis of cell therapy against HIV infection (Hendel et al 2015;Hultquist et al 2016;Xu et al 2017). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies address the CCR5 molecule per se (Castanheira et al, 2019; Jiao et al, 2018; Liu et al, 2018; Umansky, Blattner, Gebhardt, & Utikal, 2017), CCR5 pharmacological blockade (Moy et al, 2017; Pervaiz et al, 2019), CCR5 gene editing (Xie, Zhan, Ge, & Tang, 2019) and the genetic variant CCR5Δ32 (Fatima et al, 2019; Kaminski, Ellwanger, Sandrim, Pontillo, & Chies, 2019; Kletenkov et al, 2019; Słomiński et al, 2017; Toson et al, 2017; Troncoso et al, 2018). The resurgence of research involving these different aspects of CCR5 is due to two main factors: the advancement of gene‐editing technologies, which allow the exploration of the metabolic and pathophysiological effects of CCR5 editing (Allen et al, 2018; Qi et al, 2018; Vangelista & Vento, 2018; Xu et al, 2017), and the development of CCR5 blockers for clinical use (Vangelista & Vento, 2018). Recently, the different effects of CCR5 editing were much debated (Ellwanger, Kaminski, & Chies, 2019; Wang & Yang, 2019; Xie et al, 2019) after a Chinese scientist alleged to had performed this procedure on human embryos (Cyranoski & Ledford, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%