2016
DOI: 10.1038/mtna.2016.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPR-Cas9 for in vivo Gene Therapy: Promise and Hurdles

Abstract: Owing to its easy-to-use and multiplexing nature, the genome editing tool CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) associated nuclease 9) is revolutionizing many areas of medical research and one of the most amazing areas is its gene therapy potentials. Previous explorations into the therapeutic potentials of CRISPR-Cas9 were mainly conducted in vitro or in animal germlines, the translatability of which, however, is either limited (to tissues with adult stem cells amenabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, all other sgHpd1 and sgHpd2 treated mice achieved indels with frequencies ranging from 35% to 60% (Figure 2E). This level of gene inactivation likely reflects not only the initial editing events but also the competitive expansion of edited cell lineages (after NTBC withdrawal) at the expense of their unedited counterparts (6,46,55). Liver histology revealed that liver damage is substantially less severe in the sgHpd1 and sgHpd2 treated mice compared to Fah mut/mut mice injected with PBS, as indicated by the smaller numbers of multinucleated hepatocytes compared to PBS injected mice (Figure 2F).…”
Section: This Provides Us With a Context In Which To Test The Efficacmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Conversely, all other sgHpd1 and sgHpd2 treated mice achieved indels with frequencies ranging from 35% to 60% (Figure 2E). This level of gene inactivation likely reflects not only the initial editing events but also the competitive expansion of edited cell lineages (after NTBC withdrawal) at the expense of their unedited counterparts (6,46,55). Liver histology revealed that liver damage is substantially less severe in the sgHpd1 and sgHpd2 treated mice compared to Fah mut/mut mice injected with PBS, as indicated by the smaller numbers of multinucleated hepatocytes compared to PBS injected mice (Figure 2F).…”
Section: This Provides Us With a Context In Which To Test The Efficacmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, recent reports have shown that CRISPR-Cas9 components are able to in vivo correct a gene mutation in mouse models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and rescue the disease phenotype (Long et al, 2016;Nelson et al, 2016;Tabebordbar et al, 2016). Although this is a significant step forward on the way to bring CRISPR-Cas9 to the clinic, there are several major difficulties there, such as off target effects, poor fitness of edited cells or immunogenicity of CRISPR-Cas9 components (reviewed in Dai et al, 2016). Application of the system in the area of antisense RNAs might be even more challenging than that, as cis-NATs share genomic regions with their mate genes, making it harder to avoid the off target effect.…”
Section: Bace1-as: Alzheimer's Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRISPR-Cas nucleases make double-strand breaks (DSBs) at the intended target site but can also introduce unwanted mutations at off-target sites within the genome. To bring CRISPR into the clinic, accurate characterization of on- and off-target nuclease activity in any target cell population is critical ( 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%