2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPR-Cas12a-integrated transgenes in genomic safe harbors retain high expression in human hematopoietic iPSC-derived lineages and primary cells

Arsenios Vlassis,
Tanja L. Jensen,
Marina Mohr
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1a, 1b, and Supplementary table 1); (ii) predicted editability, and (iii) predicted transcriptional activity in human cells. In contrast to alternative approaches for identifying GSH candidate loci that rely on arbitrary assumptions considered to reduce risks of insertional mutagenesis 16,19,21 , the methodology applied in the current study was intended to identify and characterize hematopoietic-compatible GSH loci. The criteria for establishing an ontogenic GSH (e.g., as in germline editing for transgenic mouse generation) are much different than the criteria used to establish a cell-, or lineage-, specific safe harbor, and as such, the "global" GSH is likely to be suboptimal for adult stem cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1a, 1b, and Supplementary table 1); (ii) predicted editability, and (iii) predicted transcriptional activity in human cells. In contrast to alternative approaches for identifying GSH candidate loci that rely on arbitrary assumptions considered to reduce risks of insertional mutagenesis 16,19,21 , the methodology applied in the current study was intended to identify and characterize hematopoietic-compatible GSH loci. The criteria for establishing an ontogenic GSH (e.g., as in germline editing for transgenic mouse generation) are much different than the criteria used to establish a cell-, or lineage-, specific safe harbor, and as such, the "global" GSH is likely to be suboptimal for adult stem cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, efforts are ongoing to find new human GSH sites beyond the widely applied AAVS1 [8][9][10] , CCR5 11,12 , and hRosa26 [13][14][15] loci. Criteria have been proposed for selecting potential GSH sites that are intergenic and preferentially 50-300 kb distant from known or predicted transcriptional units [16][17][18][19] . However, the number of characterized sites following this approach have been limited and mostly evaluated in established cell lines with few examples using primary human cells 20,21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%