2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPR-Cas based virus detection: Recent advances and perspectives

Abstract: Viral infections are one of the most intimidating threats to human beings. One convincing example is the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2. Rapid, sensitive, specific and field-deployable identification of causal viruses is critical for disease surveillance, control and treatment. The shortcomings of current methods create an impending need for developing novel biosensing platforms. CRISPR-Cas systems, especially CRISPR-Cas12a and CRISPR-Cas13a, characterized by their sensitivity, specif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(174 reference statements)
0
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, emerging nucleic acid detection technologies based on CRISPR-Cas developments have opened up new opportunities for pathogen detection (Peng et al, 2020;Zhou et al, 2020;Yin et al, 2021). Compared to traditional assays, the CRISPR-Cas system has low requirements on sample quality and strong anti-interference ability and can be combined with rapid sample pretreatment technology to extract nucleic acids in the field without relying on professional equipment (Ding et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, emerging nucleic acid detection technologies based on CRISPR-Cas developments have opened up new opportunities for pathogen detection (Peng et al, 2020;Zhou et al, 2020;Yin et al, 2021). Compared to traditional assays, the CRISPR-Cas system has low requirements on sample quality and strong anti-interference ability and can be combined with rapid sample pretreatment technology to extract nucleic acids in the field without relying on professional equipment (Ding et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More strikingly, apart from human‐to‐human transmission of some contaminants and diseases, the possibility of their transmission from contaminated cold‐chain food samples to humans has also been reported (Pang et al., 2020). Although SARS‐CoV‐2 is not considered a foodborne pathogen, this has led to new challenges in the food industry and food safety detection (Yin, Man, et al., 2021).…”
Section: Food Safety Issues and Related Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the main drawback of CRISPR/Cas biosensing is that samples require pre‐treatment or nucleic acid extraction, which may be difficult for on‐site analysis. Discovering ways to overcome this pre‐treatment step is an avenue for future work 222 . The amplification step, in particular, often requires equipment that is not practical for field work.…”
Section: Analytes Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRISPR/Cas technology, initially developed and popularized as a gene editing tool, has become increasingly common in biosensing due to its high sensitivity down to the level of single nucleic acids residues, and programmability to recognize certain nucleic acids. 222 aM for hepatitis and HPV 224 ). CRISPR/Cas12a has also been used in food authenticity screening, and this avenue in particular is especially promising for the detection of pathogens in environmental samples.…”
Section: Detection Of Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%