2022
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2206744119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPR-based engineering of phages for in situ bacterial base editing

Abstract: Investigation of microbial gene function is essential to the elucidation of ecological roles and complex genetic interactions that take place in microbial communities. While microbiome studies have increased in prevalence, the lack of viable in situ editing strategies impedes experimental progress, rendering genetic knowledge and manipulation of microbial communities largely inaccessible. Here, we demonstrate the utility of phage-delivered CRISPR-Cas payloads to perform targeted genetic manipulation within a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond basic understanding of phages, resolution of gene essentiality can allow for rapid inference of deletable gene content. In tandem with wild-type Cas13 phage gene editing strategies (23), CRISPRi-ART can guide phage genome reduction for phage therapy or microbiome editing applications (4,(47)(48)(49). Furthermore, given the broad vulnerability of phages to CRISPRi-ART targeting independent of genome protection strategies (15, 17-19, 36, 39), we anticipate CRISPRi-ART to enable phage functional genomics across phage diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond basic understanding of phages, resolution of gene essentiality can allow for rapid inference of deletable gene content. In tandem with wild-type Cas13 phage gene editing strategies (23), CRISPRi-ART can guide phage genome reduction for phage therapy or microbiome editing applications (4,(47)(48)(49). Furthermore, given the broad vulnerability of phages to CRISPRi-ART targeting independent of genome protection strategies (15, 17-19, 36, 39), we anticipate CRISPRi-ART to enable phage functional genomics across phage diversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions eliminate many of the DNA assembly methods that have been reported recently. Editing procedures based on CRISPR 42 13 15 14 or living chassis 16 43 are time-consuming and relatively costly. The Gibson and Golden Gate DNA assembly methods are achieved in buffers that do not interface well with TXTL, which requires additional purification steps after assembly 21 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yeast cloning approach to phage genome engineering takes on the order of one week to achieve 64 65 . CRISPR approaches take at least one week to achieve as plasmids must be prepared for homologous recombination first 13 14 . The Golden Gate Assembly method (GGA) takes about two to three days to carry out without taking into account the step of whole genome synthesis to remove unwanted GGA sites 63 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bacteriophages (phages) comprise an immense reservoir of biotechnologically-relevant bioactive materials such as DNA engineering tools 1 and phage display 2 with broad applications in phage therapy 3 – 8 , nanotechnology 9 , 10 , and vaccine scaffolds engineering 11 , 12 . Despite this, current in vivo phage engineering approaches, based on CRISPR 13 15 , yeast assembly 16 , 17 or integrases 18 limit phage’s usage due to time consuming cloning steps and complex selection processes 19 , especially challenging for obligated lytic phages 20 . On the other hand, in vitro genome engineering is emerging as a complementary approach to assemble and edit bacteriophages with novel properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%