2021
DOI: 10.1162/daed_a_01849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criminalizing Migration

Abstract: Beginning in the 1980s, the United States embarked on a decades-long restructuring of federal laws criminalizing migration and increasing the consequences for migrants engaging in criminal activity. Today, the results are clear: a law enforcement apparatus and immigration prison system propelled by a vast infrastructure of laws and policies. The presidency of Donald Trump augmented this trend and brought it to public attention. But lost in President Trump's unique flair is an ideological commitment shared by m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ethnographic studies were undertaken during the Trump administration when intensified nativism and increased anti-immigrant sentiment were common across the United States. While these were not new constraints for many women, who contended with restrictive policies prior to the Trump era, this especially xenophobic administration highlighted the context of exclusion in the United States, where border policies make it difficult for mothers to travel home to provide in-person care to their mothers and children in their nations of origin (Abrego, 2014;Hern andez, 2021).The tightening and militarization of the border is coupled with increasingly restrictive policies within the United States, denying mothers access to resources to help themselves and protect their children from the harm of deportability (Abrego & Menjívar, 2011;Dreby, 2012;García, 2017). This is not to say that all contexts are equally exclusionary; our research is situated within relatively inclusionary state and local environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These ethnographic studies were undertaken during the Trump administration when intensified nativism and increased anti-immigrant sentiment were common across the United States. While these were not new constraints for many women, who contended with restrictive policies prior to the Trump era, this especially xenophobic administration highlighted the context of exclusion in the United States, where border policies make it difficult for mothers to travel home to provide in-person care to their mothers and children in their nations of origin (Abrego, 2014;Hern andez, 2021).The tightening and militarization of the border is coupled with increasingly restrictive policies within the United States, denying mothers access to resources to help themselves and protect their children from the harm of deportability (Abrego & Menjívar, 2011;Dreby, 2012;García, 2017). This is not to say that all contexts are equally exclusionary; our research is situated within relatively inclusionary state and local environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policies such as the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) made it increasingly difficult for immigrant families to access basic resources or secure authorized status, while also laying the foundation for increased deportations. Simultaneously, the United States–Mexico border became a highly militarized zone, making unauthorized crossings more dangerous (Hernández, 2021). The impact of these restrictive policies coupled with stringent enforcement practices at the border and in the interior contribute to the production of illegality, a social construction that attempts to marginalize and exert control over immigrants, regardless of actual immigration status (DeGenova, 2002).…”
Section: Transnational Motherhood Within Contexts Of Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the past three decades, Global North countries, especially the u.S. and the European union, have organized, sustained, and externalized criminalizing mechanisms to deter and control migration coming primarily from Latin American, Africa, and Asia (Atak and Simeon 2018;García Hernández 2021;Mountz 2020). Based on criminal law, penalties have been imposed on forced migrants, including refugees, for entering or staying in a country in an irregularized manner, using false documents, or engaging in unauthorized employment (De Genova 2002;Moffette 2021;Walia, Kelley, and Estes 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical and Methodological Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend towards the criminalization of immigrants continued to increase after 9/11, where the “war on terror” enabled the further prosecution of migrants (Stumpf, 2006). Indeed, immigration enforcement took a decidedly punitive shift where efforts now targeted U.S.-Mexico border towns in an attempt to curb entrance, terrorism, weapons, and violence (Macias-Rojas, 2016; Hernández, 2021). The “war on terror” also prompted a substantial increase in the interior enforcement of migration, where migrants are the target of enforcement efforts from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency (Armenta, 2017).…”
Section: Immigrant Detention: a System Of Racialized Social Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%