2020
DOI: 10.1590/2179-8966/2019/41015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criminalidad, economía del miedo y conflicto armado: Estudio a partir del arquetipo del “enemigo” en el contexto colombiano

Abstract: Resumen Actualmente Colombia está inmersa en un proceso de justicia transicional con diferentes actores y factores, uno de ellos, muy poco abordado, o al menos invisibilizado, es el factor “miedo” por el desenlace impreciso de la Justicia Especial para La Paz. Así, hablar de miedo y criminalidad permite hacer una reflexión conexa al conflicto armado, pues son factores transversales que imposibilitan la progresividad de los derechos.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is critical that transitional justice addresses not only the actors directly involved in the armed conflict (Aponte and Llano, 2022), such as guerrilla and paramilitary groups, but also those economic and political actors who contributed significantly to the increase in violence and human rights violations in Colombia. This involves investigating and prosecuting the corporations, companies, and individuals who, through their actions or complicity, fostered or benefited from the armed conflict (Valencia & Lopera, 2020). Transitional justice, according to Ríos and González (2021), must consider the beginning of the war from the economic environment and the current need; promoting not only a social and legal change in the conflict, but also the generation of an economic scheme to face the changes and needs of the postconflict.…”
Section: Globalization and The Colombian Armed Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is critical that transitional justice addresses not only the actors directly involved in the armed conflict (Aponte and Llano, 2022), such as guerrilla and paramilitary groups, but also those economic and political actors who contributed significantly to the increase in violence and human rights violations in Colombia. This involves investigating and prosecuting the corporations, companies, and individuals who, through their actions or complicity, fostered or benefited from the armed conflict (Valencia & Lopera, 2020). Transitional justice, according to Ríos and González (2021), must consider the beginning of the war from the economic environment and the current need; promoting not only a social and legal change in the conflict, but also the generation of an economic scheme to face the changes and needs of the postconflict.…”
Section: Globalization and The Colombian Armed Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%