Criminal Records in the European Union, The Challenge of Large-scale Information Exchange

Grijpink, J.H.A.M.

doi:10.1163/157181706776986182

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In other words, Canadian financial institutions in our sample are significantly more concerned with cross-border IDF than nationwide IDF. These results provide supporting evidence and echo the concern of other researchers (Davis, 2003;Grijpink, 2006) about cross-border IDF.…”

Section: Developing An Idf Measurement Modelsupporting

confidence: 91%

Developing an identity fraud measurement model: a factor analysis approach

Miri-Lavassani

Kumar

Movahedi

et al. 2009

Journal of Financial Crime

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose -Though many studies and reports have been published about the scale of identity fraud (IDF), no work has been done on developing models to measure IDF. The purpose of this paper is to propose a measurement model for IDF and test the validity of that measurement model. Design/methodology/approach -After providing a background on the concepts of IDF, the paper discusses the related term, identity theft. Next, a measurement model is developed, based on the current practice of measurement of IDF in four countries. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is used in identifying the indicators and factors of IDF. After the EFA is conducted, confirmatory factor analysis is employed to test the validity of the measurement model. These tests are conducted using the data collected from Canadian financial institutions. Findings -The review of the current empirical studies suggests that IDF should be assessed using a measurement model with 33 indicators to measure five factors of IDF. However, the analysis of Canadian financial institutions suggests that a measurement model that includes 27 indicators and four factors is most appropriate for the data.Research limitations/implications -The measurement model developed in the present paper is based on an examination of a sample of financial institutions in Canada. Hence, the results of this paper cannot be generalized to organizations in other sectors of the economy. Further studies in other sectors of the economy are required to identify industry-specific measurement model. Practical implications -This paper is the first approach toward developing a model for measuring IDF. Originality/value -This paper is the first study that attempts to scientifically identify and validate a measurement system in the area of IDF.

show abstract

Section: Developing An Idf Measurement Modelsupporting

confidence: 91%

Developing an identity fraud measurement model: a factor analysis approach

Miri-Lavassani

Kumar

Movahedi

et al. 2009

Journal of Financial Crime

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…21 But of course privacy has a different meaning in USA. See Whitman (2004) and for the specific case of conviction records Jacobs &Larrauri (2011) emphasized (Grijpink, 2006). * Fear of crime and the 'salience of crime as a political issue' (Zimring &Johnson, 2006) probably are not as pervasive in Europe 22 , perhaps explaining why the pressure for publicity and the requirement of checking conviction records imposed upon employers is so rare still in Spain.…”

Section: A Short Detour: the Culture Of Control And Publicity Of Crimmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conviction Records in Spain: Obstacles to Reintegration of Offenders?

Larrauri

2011

European Journal of Probation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper argues that conviction records pose a serious obstacle for the reintegration of offenders, especially in the labor market. It argues that this reintegration will be different in countries where publicity of conviction records is freely available, where employers are required to carry out regular checks before hiring their employees, and where conviction records never get expunged. The first part of the paper presents the regulation of conviction records in Spain, regarding these three matters. The paper then moves on to offer some reflections on how the erasure of spent conviction records could be strengthened and how this might aid the desistance process.

show abstract

“…5 The European Union therefore decided to extend the scope of mutual assistance to include the exchange of information.…”

Section: The European Union Response To the Council Of Europe Model Omentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The 2000 Convention supplements only the 1959 Convention. 5 See more: Buczma [2], p. 65. 6 www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/tam_en.htm.…”

Section: The European Union Response To the Council Of Europe Model Omentioning

confidence: 99%

ECRIS—a step leading to the establishment of a coherent European platform for exchange of information—remarks from a Polish perspective

Buczma¹

2011

ERA Forum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Criminal Records in the European Union, The Challenge of Large-scale Information Exchange

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

Developing an identity fraud measurement model: a factor analysis approach

Developing an identity fraud measurement model: a factor analysis approach

Conviction Records in Spain: Obstacles to Reintegration of Offenders?

ECRIS—a step leading to the establishment of a coherent European platform for exchange of information—remarks from a Polish perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About