2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crimean–Congo Hemorrhagic Fever: A bibliometric assessment of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By combining the three databases, we obtained 1994 articles (Figure 1), with an average of 123 new articles per year since 2015, the last date included in the previous study. This is in line with the reported increase of publications since the massive CCHF human outbreaks in Turkey in 2002, with an average of 100 articles per year since 2011 (31).…”
Section: Available Bibliographic Resourcessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…By combining the three databases, we obtained 1994 articles (Figure 1), with an average of 123 new articles per year since 2015, the last date included in the previous study. This is in line with the reported increase of publications since the massive CCHF human outbreaks in Turkey in 2002, with an average of 100 articles per year since 2011 (31).…”
Section: Available Bibliographic Resourcessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Bibliometric analyzes contribute to the literature in terms of giving an overview of the articles or thesis studies on the subject. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever infection was first detected in our country in a group of patients who presented with fever and petechial rash in the province of Tokat in 2002. After that, the number of cases reported in our country increased rapidly in the following years especially in 2008 and 2009 before gradually decreasing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] However, the disease remains endemic, mainly in the Northeastern Anatolian region of Turkey (Tokat, Amasya, Sivas, Gümühane, Yozgat, and Çorum). [11] According to a bibliometric analysis of CCHF by Dereli et al, [12] Cumhuriyet University conducted the most studies, 54 (3.6%) of the 1,480 research studies in Turkey, followed by Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital with 49 (3.3%) studies, and Karadeniz Technical University and Bozok University in third and fourth place, respectively. In our study, the provinces of Ankara, Erzurum, Istanbul, and Sivas were found to be the most frequently examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%