2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1910.04030
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cribriform pattern detection in prostate histopathological images using deep learning models

Abstract: Architecture, size, and shape of glands are most important patterns used by pathologists for assessment of cancer malignancy in prostate histopathological tissue slides. Varying structures of glands along with cumbersome manual observations may result in subjective and inconsistent assessment. Cribriform gland with irregular border is an important feature in Gleason pattern 4. We propose using deep neural networks for cribriform pattern classification in prostate histopathological images. 163708 Hematoxylin an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(162 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It showed a high performance (sensitivity of minimum 0.94 and specificity of minimum 0.93), focusing on a high sensitivity to avoid missing small areas of cancer. Other articles focused on the detection of more specific patterns, such as cribriform patterns with an accuracy of 0.88 and AUC of 0.8 [ 50 , 51 , 52 ] or perineural invasion with an AUC of 0.95 [ 36 ]. To evaluate the generalization of their model trained on biopsies for which they obtained an AUC of 0.96, Tsuneki et al applied it to TUR-P (TransUrethral Resection of Prostate) biopsies with an AUC of 0.80.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It showed a high performance (sensitivity of minimum 0.94 and specificity of minimum 0.93), focusing on a high sensitivity to avoid missing small areas of cancer. Other articles focused on the detection of more specific patterns, such as cribriform patterns with an accuracy of 0.88 and AUC of 0.8 [ 50 , 51 , 52 ] or perineural invasion with an AUC of 0.95 [ 36 ]. To evaluate the generalization of their model trained on biopsies for which they obtained an AUC of 0.96, Tsuneki et al applied it to TUR-P (TransUrethral Resection of Prostate) biopsies with an AUC of 0.80.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UNet model was trained using cross-validation, incorporating split-sample techniques, and subsequently validated using an external test set. Singh et al (39) suggest the use of deep neural networks for cribriform pattern classification. In this study, the authors introduce an automated image classification system employing deep learning and hand-crafted features to analyze prostate images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenging histology and morphology is often met with enduringly high rates of inter- and intra-observer variability and increased time-to-diagnosis from pathologists using light microscopy [ 34 ]. Discordance is further emphasized within the focuses of genitourinary and renal pathology, where interpretation of complex grading systems, e.g., Fuhrman and Gleason, and prognostic patterns, e.g., cribriform and glomerulosclerotic, is concerningly incongruent even amongst specialists [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. Inter-pathologist grading assessments for prostate cancer grading have elicited concerning results, with kappa values reported as low as 0.3 [ 38 , 49 ].…”
Section: Realizing the Clinical Potential Of Aimentioning
confidence: 99%