2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4309-0_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cretaceous Trionychids of Asia: An Expanded Review of Their Record and Biogeography

Abstract: This chapter presents an expanded review of all described and/or figured specimens and taxa of trionychids from the Cretaceous (Barremian to Maastrichtian) of Asia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phylogenetic relationships among modern soft-shelled turtle species are still controversial, but it is generally accepted that Trionychidae consists of two clades, Cyclanorbinae and Trionychinae, and that Trionychinae includes some well-supported monophyletic clades (Meylan, 1987;Engstrom et al, 2004). The taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of fossil trionychid species are far more controversial, and very little is known regarding the origin and early radiation of this group (Gardner et al, 1995;Joyce andLyson, 2010, 2011;Vitek and Danilov, 2010;Vitek, 2012;Danilov and Vitek, 2013;Joyce et al, 2013). The early record of soft-shelled turtles is poor, and most taxa are based either on fragmentary shells or skulls (Yeh, 1994;Hutchison, 2000;Sukhanov, 2000;Danilov and Vitek, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phylogenetic relationships among modern soft-shelled turtle species are still controversial, but it is generally accepted that Trionychidae consists of two clades, Cyclanorbinae and Trionychinae, and that Trionychinae includes some well-supported monophyletic clades (Meylan, 1987;Engstrom et al, 2004). The taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of fossil trionychid species are far more controversial, and very little is known regarding the origin and early radiation of this group (Gardner et al, 1995;Joyce andLyson, 2010, 2011;Vitek and Danilov, 2010;Vitek, 2012;Danilov and Vitek, 2013;Joyce et al, 2013). The early record of soft-shelled turtles is poor, and most taxa are based either on fragmentary shells or skulls (Yeh, 1994;Hutchison, 2000;Sukhanov, 2000;Danilov and Vitek, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of fossil trionychid species are far more controversial, and very little is known regarding the origin and early radiation of this group (Gardner et al, 1995;Joyce andLyson, 2010, 2011;Vitek and Danilov, 2010;Vitek, 2012;Danilov and Vitek, 2013;Joyce et al, 2013). The early record of soft-shelled turtles is poor, and most taxa are based either on fragmentary shells or skulls (Yeh, 1994;Hutchison, 2000;Sukhanov, 2000;Danilov and Vitek, 2013). More complete Mesozoic skull-shell-associated materials have been described only for trionychids from the Campanian and Maastrichtian of North America (Gardner et al, 1995;Brinkman, 2005;Joyce and Lyson, 2011;Vitek, 2012) or the Cenomanian-Santonian of Mongolia (Danilov et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper continues a series of publications on Cretaceous trionychids of Asia (Danilov and Vitek, 2009;Vitek andDanilov, 2010, 2012;Danilov and Vitek, 2012) and is devoted to trionychids from the Late Cretaceous (late Turonian) Bissekty Formation of the Dzharakuduk (Dzharakuduk II; Nessov, 1997) locality in Uzbekistan ( Fig. 1; see Vitek and Danilov (2010) for more details about geography).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This paper continues a series of publications on Cretaceous trionychids of Asia (Danilov and Vitek, 2009;Vitek and Danilov, 2010Danilov andVitek, 2012, 2013) and is devoted to trionychids from the early Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian) of Uzbekistan, situated in the region called Middle Asia and Kazakhstan ( Fig. 1; see Vitek and Danilov [2010] for more details about the geography of Middle Asia and Kazakhstan).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…1 for map). Data about the composition of assemblages are taken from the following publications: Nessov (1997); Vitek and Danilov (2010); Danilov et al (2011);Danilov and Vitek (2012); Vitek and Danilov (2012 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%